[DOCS] Mispellings in 9.0 docs (and probably lower too)

http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/static/different-replication-solutions.html s/propogated/propagated/ http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/static/hot-standby.html s/shapshot/snapshot/ s/statististics/statistics/ Regards Thom

Re: [DOCS] Mispellings in 9.0 docs (and probably lower too)

On 13 May 2010 14:07, Thom Brown wrote: > > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/static/different-replication-solutions.html > > s/propogated/propagated/ > > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/static/hot-standby.html > > s/shapshot/snapshot/ > > s/statististics/statistics/ > > Regards > > Thom > A

Re: [DOCS] Mispellings in 9.0 docs (and probably lower too)

On 13 May 2010 14:14, Thom Brown wrote: > On 13 May 2010 14:07, Thom Brown wrote: > >> >> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/static/different-replication-solutions.html >> >> s/propogated/propagated/ >> >> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/static/hot-standby.html >> >> s/shapshot/snapshot/ >> >

Re: [DOCS] Mispellings in 9.0 docs (and probably lower too)

On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 3:53 PM, Thom Brown wrote: > On 13 May 2010 14:14, Thom Brown wrote: >> >> On 13 May 2010 14:07, Thom Brown wrote: >>> >>> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/static/different-replication-solutions.html >>> >>> s/propogated/propagated/ >>> >>> http://www.postgresql.org/doc

Re: [DOCS] Mispellings in 9.0 docs (and probably lower too)

On 13 May 2010 15:16, Magnus Hagander wrote: > On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 3:53 PM, Thom Brown wrote: > > On 13 May 2010 14:14, Thom Brown wrote: > >> > >> On 13 May 2010 14:07, Thom Brown wrote: > >>> > >>> > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/static/different-replication-solutions.html > >>> > >

[DOCS] "supplementary storage table"?

Okay, who decided $SUBJECT was a good locution for "toast table"? I find two or three usages of that in the CREATE/ALTER TABLE reference pages, without definition. Everywhere else it's "toast table". We do not need people deciding to invent their own terminology for the docs.

Re: [DOCS] "supplementary storage table"?

On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 11:08 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > Okay, who decided $SUBJECT was a good locution for "toast table"? > I find two or three usages of that in the CREATE/ALTER TABLE reference > pages, without definition.  Everywhere else it's "toast table". > We do not need people deciding to inven

Re: [DOCS] "supplementary storage table"?

Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of jue may 13 11:08:23 -0400 2010: > Okay, who decided $SUBJECT was a good locution for "toast table"? > I find two or three usages of that in the CREATE/ALTER TABLE reference > pages, without definition. Everywhere else it's "toast table". > We do not need people

Re: [DOCS] "supplementary storage table"?

Alvaro Herrera writes: > Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of jue may 13 11:08:23 -0400 2010: >> Okay, who decided $SUBJECT was a good locution for "toast table"? >> I find two or three usages of that in the CREATE/ALTER TABLE reference >> pages, without definition. Everywhere else it's "toast tab

Re: [DOCS] Mispellings in 9.0 docs (and probably lower too)

On 13 May 2010 15:32, Thom Brown wrote: > On 13 May 2010 15:16, Magnus Hagander wrote: > >> On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 3:53 PM, Thom Brown wrote: >> > On 13 May 2010 14:14, Thom Brown wrote: >> >> >> >> On 13 May 2010 14:07, Thom Brown wrote: >> >>> >> >>> >> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/s

Re: [DOCS] Mispellings in 9.0 docs (and probably lower too)

Thom Brown writes: > Looks like someone didn't use an entity: > /pgsql/doc/src/sgml/rules.sgml > s/à/à/ Done, thanks for the suggestion. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.po