Re: [HACKERS] ToDo: add documentation for operator IS OF

> what code do you want to remove? Peter suggested removing the IS OF code itself. without compensation you hip lot of people. Time for removing was 4 years ago. Regards Pavel Stehule _ Citite se osamele? Poznejte nekoho vyj

Re: [HACKERS] ToDo: add documentation for operator IS OF

Pavel Stehule wrote: > > > documentation addition and add a comment to gram.y? > > > >OK, I have votes to remove the code, remove the documentation, and keep > >all of it but document its behavior might change in the future. > > what code do you want to remove? Peter suggested removing the IS OF

Re: [HACKERS] ToDo: add documentation for operator IS OF

> documentation addition and add a comment to gram.y? OK, I have votes to remove the code, remove the documentation, and keep all of it but document its behavior might change in the future. what code do you want to remove? I will leave the documentation, but comment it out so it doesn't appe

Re: [HACKERS] ToDo: add documentation for operator IS OF

bruce wrote: > Joe Conway wrote: > > Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > Pavel Stehule wrote: > > >> Hello, > > >> > > >> I miss doc for this operator > > > > > > Strang IS [NOT] OF wasn't documented, especially seeing it was added in > > > PostgreSQL 7.3. Anyway, documented and backpatched to 8.2.X. > >

Re: [HACKERS] ToDo: add documentation for operator IS OF

Am Dienstag, 20. Februar 2007 02:13 schrieb Bruce Momjian: > Wow, interesting. I do remember that now. Should I revert the > documentation addition and add a comment to gram.y? I'd say remove the code. Propably nobody use it for inheritancy, but some people (I am too) use it in polymorphic

Re: [HACKERS] ToDo: add documentation for operator IS OF

Am Dienstag, 20. Februar 2007 02:13 schrieb Bruce Momjian: > Wow, interesting. I do remember that now. Should I revert the > documentation addition and add a comment to gram.y? I'd say remove the code. -- Peter Eisentraut http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/ ---(en

Re: [HACKERS] ToDo: add documentation for operator IS OF

"Pavel Stehule" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Nobody worked on this subject a lot of years. Who need it, knows about it > and use it. I am for this topic is documented and in doc is note about > difference from standard and about some incompletness of this operator. Once we document it there's g

Re: [HACKERS] ToDo: add documentation for operator IS OF

Joe Conway wrote: > Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Pavel Stehule wrote: > >> Hello, > >> > >> I miss doc for this operator > > > > Strang IS [NOT] OF wasn't documented, especially seeing it was added in > > PostgreSQL 7.3. Anyway, documented and backpatched to 8.2.X. > > Here's the reason -- see this

Re: [HACKERS] ToDo: add documentation for operator IS OF

Joe Conway wrote: > Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Pavel Stehule wrote: > >> Hello, > >> > >> I miss doc for this operator > > > > Strang IS [NOT] OF wasn't documented, especially seeing it was added in > > PostgreSQL 7.3. Anyway, documented and backpatched to 8.2.X. > > Here's the reason -- see this

Re: [HACKERS] ToDo: add documentation for operator IS OF

Bruce Momjian wrote: Pavel Stehule wrote: Hello, I miss doc for this operator Strang IS [NOT] OF wasn't documented, especially seeing it was added in PostgreSQL 7.3. Anyway, documented and backpatched to 8.2.X. Here's the reason -- see this thread: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patc

Re: [HACKERS] ToDo: add documentation for operator IS OF

Pavel Stehule wrote: > Hello, > > I miss doc for this operator Strang IS [NOT] OF wasn't documented, especially seeing it was added in PostgreSQL 7.3. Anyway, documented and backpatched to 8.2.X. -- Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB

[HACKERS] ToDo: add documentation for operator IS OF

Hello, I miss doc for this operator Regards Pavel Stehule _ Emotikony a pozadi programu MSN Messenger ozivi vasi konverzaci. http://messenger.msn.cz/ ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP