> I tend to agree with this opinion. That benchmark is obsolete to the
> point of having zero connection to the modern world; which is why we
> keep not noticing when it's busted. Anyone want to argue for keeping it
> in our sources?
+1 on removing it.
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
w
Tom Lane escreveu:
> I tend to agree with this opinion. That benchmark is obsolete to the
> point of having zero connection to the modern world; which is why we
> keep not noticing when it's busted. Anyone want to argue for keeping it
> in our sources?
>
+1 for removing it.
--
Euler Taveira
Jeff Janes writes:
> The Wisconsin Benchmark in src/test/bench is broken, probably since 8.2.
Again? :-(
> Attached is a tested patch that fixes it. However, it might be better
> to just remove src/test/bench.
I tend to agree with this opinion. That benchmark is obsolete to the
point of havi
The Wisconsin Benchmark in src/test/bench is broken, probably since 8.2.
Attached is a tested patch that fixes it. However, it might be better
to just remove src/test/bench. The benchmark is quite useless,
because it is single user test that runs in the stand
alone mode, and because it is laugha
