On 5/24/17 15:34, Tom Lane wrote:
> I wrote:
>> Heikki Linnakangas writes:
>>> +1 for back-patching. If I understand correctly, it would change the
>>> behavior when you pass a string with non-ASCII leading or trailing
>>> whitespace characters to those functions. I suppose that can happen, but
I wrote:
> Heikki Linnakangas writes:
>> +1 for back-patching. If I understand correctly, it would change the
>> behavior when you pass a string with non-ASCII leading or trailing
>> whitespace characters to those functions. I suppose that can happen, but
>> it's only pure luck if the current c
Heikki Linnakangas writes:
> On 05/20/2017 01:48 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Attached is a proposed patch. I'm vacillating on whether to
>> back-patch this --- it will fix a reported bug, but it seems
>> at least somewhat conceivable that it will also break cases
>> that were working acceptably before
On 05/20/2017 01:48 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Attached is a proposed patch. I'm vacillating on whether to
back-patch this --- it will fix a reported bug, but it seems
at least somewhat conceivable that it will also break cases
that were working acceptably before. Thoughts?
+1 for back-patching. If