URL added to TODO list.
---
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > Even more interesting would be to fix things so that xml2 gets built
> > as part of the regular contrib build, but I'm not sure if we're ready
> > to
Tom Lane wrote:
> Even more interesting would be to fix things so that xml2 gets built
> as part of the regular contrib build, but I'm not sure if we're ready
> to add stuff to the configure script for the sole benefit of a
> contrib module.
It might be good to get the configury code out in this r
Tom Lane wrote:
Michael Fuhr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
contrib/xml2 currently has PG_MODULE_MAGIC in xslt_proc.c, which
results in a runtime error on systems that built the module without
support for libxslt per the comments in the Makefile. Should
PG_MODULE_MAGIC be in xpath.c instead?
Michael Fuhr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> contrib/xml2 currently has PG_MODULE_MAGIC in xslt_proc.c, which
> results in a runtime error on systems that built the module without
> support for libxslt per the comments in the Makefile. Should
> PG_MODULE_MAGIC be in xpath.c instead?
[ examines xml2
