Actually, I think Jeroen T. Vermeulen [EMAIL PROTECTED] should create the
project. It is his code, and if he would add me as an admin, that would
help. I am CC'ing him.
---
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
On Sun, 18 Aug 2002,
Oh, sorry. I will do it now.
---
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
We're talking about libpq++, not libpqxx :)
On Mon, 19 Aug 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Actually, I think Jeroen T. Vermeulen [EMAIL PROTECTED] should
Done. Called libpq++.
---
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Oh, sorry. I will do it now.
---
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
We're talking about libpq++,
Marc G. Fournier writes:
Okay, here is what I'd like to suggest ... Bruce, let's start off really
simple ... go create a project for libpq++ (I believe someone even
volunteered to maintain it?) and let me know once created, and I'll move
the CVS directory over for libpq++ and out of the
On Sun, 18 Aug 2002, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Marc G. Fournier writes:
Okay, here is what I'd like to suggest ... Bruce, let's start off really
simple ... go create a project for libpq++ (I believe someone even
volunteered to maintain it?) and let me know once created, and I'll move
the
On Thu, 15 Aug 2002, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
integrate or remove new libpqxx
integrate or add to gborg Pg:DBD
Seems like gborg is the place for these.
I would volunteer to package libpq++ separately.
Okay, the procedure is simple, but where do we want to put this? Do we
want
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
On Thu, 15 Aug 2002, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
integrate or remove new libpqxx
integrate or add to gborg Pg:DBD
Seems like gborg is the place for these.
I would volunteer to package libpq++ separately.
Okay, the procedure is simple, but where do we
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Now, I know one of Marc's goals is to have libpq as a stand-alone
tarball, but I thought we decided that this _didn't_ require it to be in
a separate CVS repository.
Removing libpq is impossible since psql, pg_dump, etc all depend on it.
I don't think
Marc G. Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Bruce, can you make a project for Pg::DBD?
Erm, has anyone contacted the maintainer of DBD::Pg? Given that Bruce
doesn't maintain it and AFAIK Jeffrey Baker (the current maintainer)
and hasn't expressed any dissatisfaction with CPAN, I'm not sure why
Neil Conway wrote:
Marc G. Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Bruce, can you make a project for Pg::DBD?
Erm, has anyone contacted the maintainer of DBD::Pg? Given that Bruce
doesn't maintain it and AFAIK Jeffrey Baker (the current maintainer)
and hasn't expressed any dissatisfaction with
On Sat, 17 Aug 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
OK, I am ready to do the work, but I would like to get a plan of where
we are going. I see in interfaces:
cli
ecpg
jdbc
libpgeasy
libpgtcl
libpq
libpq++
libpqxx
odbc
perl5
On Sat, 17 Aug 2002, Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Now, I know one of Marc's goals is to have libpq as a stand-alone
tarball, but I thought we decided that this _didn't_ require it to be in
a separate CVS repository.
Removing libpq is impossible since psql,
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
Chris has made code changes to GBorg to allow for this based on requests
from Dave Page (ie. PgAdminII) ... so there is no problems with that ...
As for keeping them in our main CVS, the more we put over onto GBorg, the
more it will get used, test, debugged, pounded
On Sat, 17 Aug 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
Chris has made code changes to GBorg to allow for this based on requests
from Dave Page (ie. PgAdminII) ... so there is no problems with that ...
As for keeping them in our main CVS, the more we put over onto GBorg, the
Marc G. Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I think the only unknown is whether their CVS's should be moved out of
the main tree.
Yes, they should be ...
Certainly. I was a bit worried about losing CVS history, but Marc
indicated he could make the move with history and all, so there's
no
On Sat, 17 Aug 2002, Tom Lane wrote:
Marc G. Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I think the only unknown is whether their CVS's should be moved out of
the main tree.
Yes, they should be ...
Certainly. I was a bit worried about losing CVS history, but Marc
indicated he could make the
16 matches
Mail list logo
