Dear Gurus,
I have a query discussed here earlier that suffers heavily from "lack of
view flattening" in v7.3. Following Tom's guidance, I made a conclusion to
that thread
(http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-performance/2003-05/msg00215.php)
and asked it to be confirmed or fixed, but I didn't ge
Alexandre,
I missed your orig. post, but AFAIK multiprocessing kernels will handle HT
CPUs as 2 CPUs each. Thus, our dual Xeon 2.4 is recognized as 4 Xeon 2.4
CPUs.
This way, I don't think HT would improve any single query (afaik no postgres
process uses more than one cpu), but overall multi-quer
"Jeremy M. Guthrie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I looked back at my code and I also need to reclarify something. The delete
> at the end is multiple delete statements within a transaction.
I think you are going to have to show us all the details of what you're
doing in between these queries.
I can help with this too.
---
scott.marlowe wrote:
> I'm willing to help too. I'm basically a DBA / developer type, with mild
> C hacking skills (I develop in PHP, so my C coding is quite rusty
> nowadays.)
>
> If nothin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I looked back at my code and I also need to reclarify something. The delete
at the end is multiple delete statements within a transaction.
After full vacuum with 160,000 records in Table: (takes a bit the first time
through)
Tlog=# explain analyze
Brian Tarbox wrote:
> Oddly enough, the particular application in question will have an extremely
> small user base...perhaps a few simultainous users at most.
>
> As to the testing, I neglected to say early in this thread that my manager
> instructed me _not_ to do further performance testing...s
I think the issue with multiple users is that a car is good for moving a
few people, but it can't move lots of large boxes. A truck can move
large boxes, but it can't move a few people efficiently. PostgreSQL is
more like a truck, while MySQL is more like a car.
As an aside, I think Solaris is s
Keep in mind that if we auto-tune, we will only be able to do it for
some platforms, so we will need a table that shows which settings are
autotuned for each platform.
---
Sean Chittenden wrote:
> > I don't have much to add
Michael Pohl wrote:
> On Sun, 6 Jul 2003, Matthew Nuzum wrote:
>
> > At the very least, if there is good documentation for these parameters,
> > maybe the conf file should provide a link to this info.
>
> I believe that is what Josh is proposing:
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-perform
