Jim C. Nasby wrote:
No, it's part of FreeBSD's UFS. google FreeBSD softupdates and you
should get plenty of info.
As I said, it's probably not worth worrying about.
On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 08:21:23AM -0700, Y Sidhu wrote:
What do you mean by "softupdates?" Is that a parameter in what I am gues
Michael Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 03:34:42PM -0400, Chris Browne wrote:
>> If CLUSTER is faster than VACUUM FULL (and if it isn't, in all cases,
>> it *frequently* is, and probably will be, nearly always, soon), then
>> it's a faster workaround.
> Cluster reorders
Michael Stone wrote:
> On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 03:34:42PM -0400, Chris Browne wrote:
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael Stone) writes:
> >>Unless, of course, you don't particularly care about the order of
> >>the items in your table; you might end up wasting vastly more time
> >>rewriting tables due to
On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 03:34:42PM -0400, Chris Browne wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael Stone) writes:
Unless, of course, you don't particularly care about the order of
the items in your table; you might end up wasting vastly more time
rewriting tables due to unnecessary clustering than for ful
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael Stone) writes:
> On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 12:09:26PM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>>Maybe, but we should also mention that CLUSTER is a likely faster
>>workaround.
>
> Unless, of course, you don't particularly care about the order of
> the items in your table; you might en
On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 12:09:26PM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Maybe, but we should also mention that CLUSTER is a likely faster
workaround.
Unless, of course, you don't particularly care about the order of the
items in your table; you might end up wasting vastly more time rewriting
tables d
On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 12:09:26PM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
> > "Jim C. Nasby" writes:
> >
> > > On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 09:41:46AM +0200, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > > > Come on, I don't suggest to remove several bold warnings about
> > >
Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
> "Jim C. Nasby" writes:
>
> > On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 09:41:46AM +0200, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > > Come on, I don't suggest to remove several bold warnings about
> > > it, the best one being "Therefore, frequently using VACUUM FULL
> > > can have
"Jim C. Nasby" writes:
> On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 09:41:46AM +0200, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
[...]
> > Come on, I don't suggest to remove several bold warnings about
> > it, the best one being "Therefore, frequently using VACUUM FULL
> > can have an extremely negative effect on the performanc
No, it's part of FreeBSD's UFS. google FreeBSD softupdates and you
should get plenty of info.
As I said, it's probably not worth worrying about.
On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 08:21:23AM -0700, Y Sidhu wrote:
> What do you mean by "softupdates?" Is that a parameter in what I am guessing
> is the conf fi
On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 09:41:46AM +0200, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
> Michael Stone writes:
>
> > On Tue, May 15, 2007 at 06:43:50PM +0200, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
> > >patch - basically, I think the documentation under estimates (or
> > >sometimes misses) the benefit of VACUUM FULL for sca
Cool!
Now we can point people to your faq instead of repeating the "dd" test
instructions. Thanks for normalizing this out of the list :-)
- Luke
On 5/15/07 8:55 PM, "Greg Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've been taking notes on what people ask about on this list, mixed that
> up with wo
What do you mean by "softupdates?" Is that a parameter in what I am guessing
is the conf file?
Yudhvir
On 5/15/07, Jim C. Nasby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm guessing you're seeing the affect of softupdates. With those enabled
it can take some time before the space freed by a delete will act
Michael Stone writes:
> On Tue, May 15, 2007 at 06:43:50PM +0200, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
> >patch - basically, I think the documentation under estimates (or
> >sometimes misses) the benefit of VACUUM FULL for scans, and the
> >needs of VACUUM FULL if the routine VACUUM hasn't been done
> >pr
14 matches
Mail list logo
