Szii
I suggest you test it. You will discover that the opposite is usually true.
Also, you may have discovered other reasons why Unified ODBC does not
fulfill the value of ODBC.
Best regards,
Andrew
Andrew Hill
Director Technology Evangelism
Yeah, I'm using the Unified ODBC. The abstraction layer over DB2's CLI
is faster than "real" ODBC.
-Szii
At 08:57 AM 1/19/01 -0500, Andrew Hill wrote:
>Regarding the wrapper - I assume you are using the built-in unified-odbc...
>which isn't really ODBC.
>As I understand it unified-odbc is just
Regarding the wrapper - I assume you are using the built-in unified-odbc...
which isn't really ODBC.
As I understand it unified-odbc is just a common function set as a minimal
abstraction to several databases whose syntax calls are fairly similar.
Have you tried a 'real' ODBC layer? e.g. compile