Re: [PHP-DEV] chroot(): _not_ safe-mode restricted?

EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 2:01 PM Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] chroot(): _not_ safe-mode restricted? > > > As I read it in CVS, chroot() will work even in safe-mode. Isn't this a > bad > > > idea(tm), or am I wrong? > > > If users can chroot in sa

Re: [PHP-DEV] chroot(): _not_ safe-mode restricted?

On Mon, 20 Aug 2001, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: > > > As I read it in CVS, chroot() will work even in safe-mode. Isn't this a > > > bad idea(tm), or am I wrong? > > > If users can chroot in safe-mode, Apache won't serve any more pages > > > after all children have been chrooted to an empty dir

Re: [PHP-DEV] chroot(): _not_ safe-mode restricted?

> > As I read it in CVS, chroot() will work even in safe-mode. Isn't this a bad > > idea(tm), or am I wrong? > > If users can chroot in safe-mode, Apache won't serve any more pages after > > all children have been chrooted to an empty dir? > > uhm, where have you read that? [ curious ] I just r

Re: [PHP-DEV] chroot(): _not_ safe-mode restricted?

On Mon, 20 Aug 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi jeroen! > On Mon, 20 Aug 2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > As I read it in CVS, chroot() will work even in safe-mode. Isn't this a bad > > idea(tm), or am I wrong? > > If users can chroot in safe-mode, Apache won't serve any more pages after >

Re: [PHP-DEV] chroot(): _not_ safe-mode restricted?

Hi jeroen! On Mon, 20 Aug 2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > As I read it in CVS, chroot() will work even in safe-mode. Isn't this a bad > idea(tm), or am I wrong? > If users can chroot in safe-mode, Apache won't serve any more pages after > all children have been chrooted to an empty dir? uhm, w

[PHP-DEV] chroot(): _not_ safe-mode restricted?

As I read it in CVS, chroot() will work even in safe-mode. Isn't this a bad idea(tm), or am I wrong? If users can chroot in safe-mode, Apache won't serve any more pages after all children have been chrooted to an empty dir? --jeroen -- PHP Development Mailing List To un