Web scripting language, I think that the chances of people
expecting this
I use it as a system scripting language and vote +1 for numeric arguments
to
work the expected way.
I want to use it as a system programming language. But fork() is missing :)
Anyway this shows we use php for many
On Mon, 1 Oct 2001, Lenar wrote:
I want to use it as a system programming language. But fork() is missing :)
Fork is not missing, pctnl_fork is the name iirc.
Derick
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands,
[Zeev Suraski [EMAIL PROTECTED]]
The WTF factor is generally higher with magical stuff like that. It's
not too far fetched to realize a situation where a 'WTF?' will be
flown into the air, just because the error message happened to be 1,
or 20...
shell_exit() is not a very good name.
On Fri, 28 Sep 2001, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
How about if we overload it a bit. I think anybody who does exit(1) is
expecting 1 to be set as the return status whereas someone who does
exit('something bad happened') is expecting the string to be shown a-la
die(). So let's just check the arg
Markus Fischer wrote:
Usualy I am very much against breaking backwards compatibility, but in this
case I think it's the best thing to do... Because:
- It's already documented that way
- It's the 'expected' behaviour (from other languages, and from the docs)
As Rasmus said: It would be surprising
