rxtx_2.2pre2-5_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into experimental

Accepted: librxtx-java_2.2pre2-5_amd64.deb to main/r/rxtx/librxtx-java_2.2pre2-5_amd64.deb rxtx_2.2pre2-5.debian.tar.gz to main/r/rxtx/rxtx_2.2pre2-5.debian.tar.gz rxtx_2.2pre2-5.dsc to main/r/rxtx/rxtx_2.2pre2-5.dsc Override entries for your package: librxtx-java_2.2pre2-5_amd64.deb - o

Processing of rxtx_2.2pre2-5_amd64.changes

rxtx_2.2pre2-5_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: rxtx_2.2pre2-5.dsc rxtx_2.2pre2-5.debian.tar.gz librxtx-java_2.2pre2-5_amd64.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) __ This is the maintainer address of Debian

Processed: Re: Processed: still not fixed

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reopen 585089 Bug #585089 {Done: Scott Howard } [librxtx-java] librxtx-java FTBFS kfreebsd > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 585089: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=585089 Debian Bu

Processed: still not fixed

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > notfixed 585089 2.2pre2-4 Bug #585089 {Done: Scott Howard } [librxtx-java] librxtx-java FTBFS kfreebsd Bug No longer marked as fixed in versions rxtx/2.2pre2-4. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 585

Bug#585089: still not fixed

notfixed 585089 2.2pre2-4 thanks still not fixed...trying patch with: #if defined(__FreeBSD__) || defined(__FreeBSD_kernel__) [...] #endif http://glibc-bsd.alioth.debian.org/porting/PORTING __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team

Bug#609152: marked as done (rxtx: rxtx includes sys/io.h on systems where it doesn't exist)

Your message dated Fri, 04 Feb 2011 02:39:17 + with message-id and subject line Bug#609152: fixed in rxtx 2.2pre2-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #609152, regarding rxtx: rxtx includes sys/io.h on systems where it doesn't exist to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the probl

Bug#585089: marked as done (librxtx-java FTBFS kfreebsd)

Your message dated Fri, 04 Feb 2011 02:39:17 + with message-id and subject line Bug#585089: fixed in rxtx 2.2pre2-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #585089, regarding librxtx-java FTBFS kfreebsd to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is

Bug#472053: marked as done (librxtx-java: gnu.io.RXTXPort discards exception silently if initialization fails)

Your message dated Fri, 04 Feb 2011 02:39:17 + with message-id and subject line Bug#472053: fixed in rxtx 2.2pre2-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #472053, regarding librxtx-java: gnu.io.RXTXPort discards exception silently if initialization fails to be marked as done. This means that you

rxtx_2.2pre2-4_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into experimental

Accepted: librxtx-java_2.2pre2-4_amd64.deb to main/r/rxtx/librxtx-java_2.2pre2-4_amd64.deb rxtx_2.2pre2-4.debian.tar.gz to main/r/rxtx/rxtx_2.2pre2-4.debian.tar.gz rxtx_2.2pre2-4.dsc to main/r/rxtx/rxtx_2.2pre2-4.dsc Override entries for your package: librxtx-java_2.2pre2-4_amd64.deb - o

Processing of rxtx_2.2pre2-4_amd64.changes

rxtx_2.2pre2-4_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: rxtx_2.2pre2-4.dsc rxtx_2.2pre2-4.debian.tar.gz librxtx-java_2.2pre2-4_amd64.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) __ This is the maintainer address of Debian

Processed: Changing submitter address

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # I'm just changing the submitter address for my bugs from > # sand...@crustytoothpaste.ath.cx to sand...@crustytoothpaste.net. No > # need to worry if you accidentally send to the old address; it will > # continue to work for the indefinite futu

Re: Anybody working on MPJ Express?

Am 03.02.2011 11:29, schrieb Andreas Tille: > mpj-v0_38/lib/daemon.jar > mpj-v0_38/lib/javax.servlet.jar We have several versions. > mpj-v0_38/lib/loader1.jar > mpj-v0_38/lib/loader2.jar > mpj-v0_38/lib/log4j-1.2.11.jar no problem > mpj-v0_38/lib/mxdev.jar > mpj-v0_38/lib/niodev.jar > mpj-v0_

Re: Anybody working on MPJ Express?

On Thu, Feb 03, 2011 at 09:00:13AM +0100, Torsten Werner wrote: > Am 03.02.2011 08:53, schrieb Andreas Tille: > > I'd like to work on some Biological packages written in Java and using > > MPI[1]. As usual these projects simply include everything and I wonder > > whether some of you had possibly p

libjlatexmath-java_0.9.4-1_i386.changes ACCEPTED into experimental

Accepted: libjlatexmath-fop-java_0.9.4-1_all.deb to main/libj/libjlatexmath-java/libjlatexmath-fop-java_0.9.4-1_all.deb libjlatexmath-java-doc_0.9.4-1_all.deb to main/libj/libjlatexmath-java/libjlatexmath-java-doc_0.9.4-1_all.deb libjlatexmath-java_0.9.4-1.diff.gz to main/libj/libjlatexmat

Processing of libjlatexmath-java_0.9.4-1_i386.changes

libjlatexmath-java_0.9.4-1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: libjlatexmath-java_0.9.4-1.dsc libjlatexmath-java_0.9.4.orig.tar.gz libjlatexmath-java_0.9.4-1.diff.gz libjlatexmath-java_0.9.4-1_all.deb libjlatexmath-java-doc_0.9.4-1_all.deb libjlatexmath