On Thu, 12 Jul 2007 21:36:35 -0400
Brad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Jul 2007 17:43:50 -0400
> Brad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 6 Jul 2007 00:20:31 -0400
> > Brad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > mutt having SMTP support is pretty cool. Having SASL support enabled
> >
When running "make -d l package" on a port, it exits with an error, tail
of compile below.
(Complete tail of compile below.) I'm running 4.1-stable. I've
encountered this on courier-authlib and cabextract, but not on
msttcorefonts. Any suggestions?
Output of doing "make -d l package" afte
On Mon, 16 Jul 2007, Landry Breuil wrote:
- --prefix=${LOCALBASE} looks wrong
Changed to /usr/local
Huh? No, it should be --prefix=${PREFIX}
- fake target fails when USE_SYSTRACE is set
Weird, works here with systrace enabled on three various -current.
Yeah, must be a local fuck up.
A
On Mon, Jul 16, 2007 at 11:06:12PM +0200, Landry Breuil wrote:
> > - --prefix=${LOCALBASE} looks wrong
>
> Changed to /usr/local
I didn't look at the port itself, but just to clarify this a little bit:
LOCALBASE is where dependencies actually reside, so it's typically
used for -I and -L argsumen
On Sun, Jul 15, 2007 at 06:41:53PM +0200, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
> On Sun, 15 Jul 2007, Landry Breuil wrote:
> >Port available here : http://ports.gcu.info/doku.php/openbsd/x11/fbpanel
>
> - --prefix=${LOCALBASE} looks wrong
Changed to /usr/local
> - COMMENT doesn't need quotes nor final dot
O
Hi!
So ... I got an espie@ timeout with this for >1 week. I hope that it's
OK to let others look at this update now.
The reason for this update is an annoying crash in the in-tree version's
src/video.c:70 (negative array index). I fixed the problem and then
found out that some Debian people
On Sunday 15 July 2007 1:45:20 pm Benoit Chesneau wrote:
> I tested on cvs version with i386. I have no warning yet. Juste one
> thing why don't you use -DGC_OPENBSD_THREADS flag to enable use of
> pthread. It worked.
Defining GC_OPENBSD_THREADS is not sufficient for enabling
thread support in boe
On 7/14/07, Antoine Jacoutot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, 13 Jul 2007, Landry Breuil wrote:
> Please forget about it, it's a rough wip and needs way more
patching/testing
> in GNUmakefiles. I'll repost it later.
Here's a cleaned up version.
Not perfect yet but if people feel like testing.
