Re: Regarding support for Wince

2008-11-11 Thread Kenton Varda
I actually don't know. You'd have to try compiling it and running the tests and tell me what happens. On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 9:43 PM, mpprasad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Is the Protocol Buffers supports WinCE platform? > > Thanks > Prasad. > > > --~--~-~--~~~---

Re: C++: Optional Message problems

2008-11-11 Thread Kenton Varda
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 10:41 AM, Kenton Varda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Either blah.ByteSize() or blah.size() would be valid things to use. > I mean, message.ByteSize() or str.size(). --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed t

Re: C++: Optional Message problems

2008-11-11 Thread Kenton Varda
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 7:46 AM, ChJees <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I managed to solve my problem now. I used the blah.Bytesize() function > instead of sizeof( blah.c_str() ) when sending the message size :3. Ah, yes, don't use c_str() with serialized protobufs because they may contain zeros be

Re: C++: Optional Message problems

2008-11-11 Thread ChJees
I managed to solve my problem now. I used the blah.Bytesize() function instead of sizeof( blah.c_str() ) when sending the message size :3. Someone should really add to documentation about Sending and Receiving info between Server and Clients to prevent further Headaches. (Not small ones either!)

Re: Regarding support for Wince

2008-11-11 Thread Marc Gravell
I have no idea about the core C++ etc impementations - but if it helps, protobuf-net builds for .NET CF 2.0 and .NET CF 3.5, if that is any help. Note that there isn't an RPC stack for this yet, but I'm working on it. Marc --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this me