Thanks a lot Ted. It's working now. I appreciate all your help.
Thanks,
Taylor
From: Ted Ross [tr...@redhat.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2013 8:26 AM
To: proton@qpid.apache.org
Subject: Re: Is Proton a lightweight alternative to Qpid?
A couple of t
nt: Wednesday, January 16, 2013 12:13 PM
To: proton@qpid.apache.org
Subject: RE: Is Proton a lightweight alternative to Qpid?
Rafael and Ted,
Thanks for your help on this. I'm excited to see that proton is getting a
Windows port since I wasn't able to build it in VS2012 success
.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2013 12:13 PM
To: proton@qpid.apache.org
Subject: RE: Is Proton a lightweight alternative to Qpid?
Rafael and Ted,
Thanks for your help on this. I'm excited to see that proton is getting a
Windows port since I wasn't able to build it in VS2012 successful
rebased. I'm planning to do this soon, since a new
release is out for proton
Thanks,
Mary Hinton
-Original Message-
From: Eagy, Taylor [mailto:te...@blackbirdtech.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2013 12:13 PM
To: proton@qpid.apache.org
Subject: RE: Is Proton a lightweight altern
13 8:13 PM
To: proton@qpid.apache.org
Subject: Re: Is Proton a lightweight alternative to Qpid?
If you run cmake this way you can build the minimal code needed for just
the proton library and its python bindings:
cmake -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=/usr -DBUILD_PYTHON=ON -DBUILD_PHP=OFF
-DBUIL
If you run cmake this way you can build the minimal code needed for just
the proton library and its python bindings:
cmake -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=/usr -DBUILD_PYTHON=ON -DBUILD_PHP=OFF
-DBUILD_PERL=OFF -DBUILD_RUBY=OFF
A quick test on my system shows that a make install based on the above
build
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 12:37 PM, Eagy, Taylor wrote:
> Rafael,
>
>
>
> Thanks for responding. The only reason why I said it wouldn't be portable
> is because when I saw the CMake files I thought I'd have to build it to
> bind C functions from the engine to Python. However, if I can perform the
>
Taylor,
You need the following files:
proton.py (from proton-c/bindings/python)
cproton.py (from $BUILD/bindings/python)
_cproton.so(from $BUILD/bindings/python)
libqpid-proton.so (from $BUILD)
-Ted
On 01/15/2013 03:35 PM, Eagy, Taylor wrote:
Ted,
s,
Taylor
From: Ted Ross [tr...@redhat.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2013 1:34 PM
To: proton@qpid.apache.org
Subject: Re: Is Proton a lightweight alternative to Qpid?
Taylor,
Another possibility to look at is using ActiveMQ as your broker. They've
added an AMQP transport (ba
oton
can do. Do you think it's overkill to use something like Qpid or Proton in my
scenario?
Thanks,
Taylor
From: Rafael Schloming [r...@alum.mit.edu]
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2013 8:44 AM
To: proton@qpid.apache.org
Subject: Re: Is Proton a lightweight
ary 15, 2013 8:44 AM
To: proton@qpid.apache.org
Subject: Re: Is Proton a lightweight alternative to Qpid?
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 11:14 AM, Eagy, Taylor wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
>
>
> I've been using Qpid for the past several months and I really like it.
> However, I've ma
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 11:14 AM, Eagy, Taylor wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
>
>
> I've been using Qpid for the past several months and I really like it.
> However, I've mainly just been using it to pass messages between several
> Python processes running on the same machine, so using Qpid is probably
> ove
Hi guys,
I've been using Qpid for the past several months and I really like it. However,
I've mainly just been using it to pass messages between several Python
processes running on the same machine, so using Qpid is probably overkill. Then
I noticed Proton and got excited. Ideally I'm looking
13 matches
Mail list logo
