On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 4:23 PM, Pablo Castro
wrote:
>
> From: public-webapps-requ...@w3.org [mailto:public-webapps-requ...@w3.org] On
> Behalf Of Jonas Sicking
> Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2010 1:27 PM
> Subject: Re: [IndexedDB] Event on commits (WAS: Proposal for async
From: public-webapps-requ...@w3.org [mailto:public-webapps-requ...@w3.org] On
Behalf Of Jonas Sicking
Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2010 1:27 PM
Subject: Re: [IndexedDB] Event on commits (WAS: Proposal for async API changes)
>> >> >>> One of the things that will entail is a by-s
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 11:48 AM, Jeremy Orlow wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 6:15 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 6:31 AM, Andrei Popescu
>> wrote:
>> > On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 1:39 PM, Jeremy Orlow
>> > wrote:
>> >> Splitting into its own thread since this isn't reall
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 8:13 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 11:48 AM, Jeremy Orlow
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 6:15 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> >>
> >> On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 6:31 AM, Andrei Popescu
> >> wrote:
> >> > On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 1:39 PM, Jeremy Orlow
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 12:31 PM, Jeremy Orlow wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 8:13 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 11:48 AM, Jeremy Orlow
>> wrote:
>> > On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 6:15 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 6:31 AM, Andrei Popescu
>>
For some reason I thought postMessage was broadcast, but looking at it
further I was entirely incorrect.
-Mikeal
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 12:02 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 12:00 PM, Mikeal Rogers
> wrote:
>> Ah, good point. I hadn't thought about just using postMessage in
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 12:00 PM, Mikeal Rogers wrote:
> Ah, good point. I hadn't thought about just using postMessage in my
> ontransactioncommitted, that'll work. Thanks.
Except, how do you get a reference to the other windows that are
affected? There is no API to enumarate all windows that use
Ah, good point. I hadn't thought about just using postMessage in my
ontransactioncommitted, that'll work. Thanks.
-Mikeal
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 11:48 AM, Jeremy Orlow wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 6:15 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 6:31 AM, Andrei Popescu
>> wrote
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 6:15 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 6:31 AM, Andrei Popescu
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 1:39 PM, Jeremy Orlow
> wrote:
> >> Splitting into its own thread since this isn't really connected to the
> new
> >> Async interface and that thread is a
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 6:31 AM, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 1:39 PM, Jeremy Orlow wrote:
>> Splitting into its own thread since this isn't really connected to the new
>> Async interface and that thread is already pretty big.
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 10:36 PM, Mikeal Roger
Yes. Sorry for not being clear.
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 2:31 PM, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 1:39 PM, Jeremy Orlow wrote:
> > Splitting into its own thread since this isn't really connected to the
> new
> > Async interface and that thread is already pretty big.
> >
> > On W
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 1:39 PM, Jeremy Orlow wrote:
> Splitting into its own thread since this isn't really connected to the new
> Async interface and that thread is already pretty big.
>
> On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 10:36 PM, Mikeal Rogers
> wrote:
>>
>> I've been looking through the current spec a
Splitting into its own thread since this isn't really connected to the new
Async interface and that thread is already pretty big.
On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 10:36 PM, Mikeal Rogers wrote:
> I've been looking through the current spec and all the proposed changes.
>
> Great work. I'm going to be buildi
13 matches
Mail list logo
