this for the charter update. We
>have been involved in Push-based enabler and service design since
>pre-2000, and with that background I think we have a good foundation to
>resolve the questions you noted.
>
>Thanks,
>Bryan Sullivan
>
>-Original Message-----
>From: Karl
ubject: Re: Regarding app notification and wake up
Le 9 mars 2012 à 19:43, SULLIVAN, BRYAN L a écrit :
> This is different from the earlier discussion on extending SSE to
> connectionless event sources, as there's no assumption the Webapp is running
> in this case. If the Webapp *is*
Le 9 mars 2012 à 19:43, SULLIVAN, BRYAN L a écrit :
> This is different from the earlier discussion on extending SSE to
> connectionless event sources, as there's no assumption the Webapp is running
> in this case. If the Webapp *is* running, it's within the scope of what we
> have discussed ea
On 03/12/2012 06:02 PM, Charles McCathieNevile wrote:
On Fri, 09 Mar 2012 09:10:19 +0100, Stefan Hakansson LK
wrote:
The webrtc WG has identified that the ability to notify, and possibly
wake up, a web application of incoming events is important. This to
enable support of use cases such as in
On Fri, 09 Mar 2012 09:10:19 +0100, Stefan Hakansson LK
wrote:
The webrtc WG has identified that the ability to notify, and possibly
wake up, a web application of incoming events is important. This to
enable support of use cases such as incoming calls. And in certain
scenarios the resour
c: Stefan Hakansson LK; public-webapps@w3.org
Subject: RE: Regarding app notification and wake up
On Sat, 10 Mar 2012, SULLIVAN, BRYAN L wrote:
>
> Stefan may respond with more detail, but the use cases we submitted for
> WebRTC consideration describe this as the ability to invoke an
On Sat, 10 Mar 2012, SULLIVAN, BRYAN L wrote:
>
> Stefan may respond with more detail, but the use cases we submitted for
> WebRTC consideration describe this as the ability to invoke an
> application and pass an event to it, whether it is running (or not) at
> the time of the event reception b
--Original Message-
From: Ian Hickson [mailto:i...@hixie.ch]
Sent: Friday, March 09, 2012 4:09 PM
To: Stefan Hakansson LK
Cc: public-webapps@w3.org
Subject: Re: Regarding app notification and wake up
On Fri, 9 Mar 2012, Stefan Hakansson LK wrote:
>
> The webrtc WG has identified tha
On Fri, 9 Mar 2012, Stefan Hakansson LK wrote:
>
> The webrtc WG has identified that the ability to notify, and possibly
> wake up, a web application of incoming events is important. This to
> enable support of use cases such as incoming calls. And in certain
> scenarios the resource use (e.g. p
posed discussion in
Webapps.
Thanks,
Bryan Sullivan
-Original Message-
From: Scott Wilson [mailto:scott.bradley.wil...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, March 09, 2012 6:35 AM
To: Stefan Hakansson LK
Cc: public-webapps@w3.org
Subject: Re: Regarding app notification and wake up
On 9 Mar 2012, at 08:10, S
On 9 Mar 2012, at 08:10, Stefan Hakansson LK wrote:
> The webrtc WG has identified that the ability to notify, and possibly wake
> up, a web application of incoming events is important. This to enable support
> of use cases such as incoming calls. And in certain scenarios the resource
> use (e
The webrtc WG has identified that the ability to notify, and possibly
wake up, a web application of incoming events is important. This to
enable support of use cases such as incoming calls. And in certain
scenarios the resource use (e.g. power) is very important.
However, this kind of function
12 matches
Mail list logo
