Thanks Tim! You are the best. Hopefully I will get to this later tonight.
Be Well
Anthony
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 9:20 PM, Tim Burgess wrote:
>
>
> On Jun 06, 2013, at 04:19 AM, Anthony Scopatz wrote:
>
> Thanks Antonio and Tim!
>
> These are great. I think that one of these should definitel
On Jun 06, 2013, at 04:19 AM, Anthony Scopatz wrote:Thanks Antonio and Tim!These are great. I think that one of these should definitely make it into the examples/ dir.Be WellAnthony OK. I have put up a pull request with the code added. https://github.com/PyTables/PyTables/pull/266Cheers, Tim
-
Hi Jeff,
I have made some comments in the issue. Thanks for investigating this
so thoroughly.
Be Well
Anthony
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 8:16 PM, Jeff Reback wrote:
> Anthony,
>
> I created an issue with more info
>
> I am not sure if this is a bug, or just a way both ne/pytables treat
> strings
Thanks Antonio and Tim!
These are great. I think that one of these should definitely make it into
the examples/ dir.
Be Well
Anthony
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 8:10 AM, Francesc Alted wrote:
> On 6/5/13 11:45 AM, Andreas Hilboll wrote:
> > On 05.06.2013 10:31, Andreas Hilboll wrote:
> >> On 05.06
On 6/5/13 11:45 AM, Andreas Hilboll wrote:
> On 05.06.2013 10:31, Andreas Hilboll wrote:
>> On 05.06.2013 03:29, Tim Burgess wrote:
>>> I was playing around with in-memory HDF5 prior to the 3.0 release.
>>> Here's an example based on what I was doing.
>>> I looked over the docs and it does mention
On 6/5/13 11:45 AM, Andreas Hilboll wrote:
> On 05.06.2013 10:31, Andreas Hilboll wrote:
>> On 05.06.2013 03:29, Tim Burgess wrote:
>>> I was playing around with in-memory HDF5 prior to the 3.0 release.
>>> Here's an example based on what I was doing.
>>> I looked over the docs and it does mention
On 05.06.2013 10:31, Andreas Hilboll wrote:
> On 05.06.2013 03:29, Tim Burgess wrote:
>> I was playing around with in-memory HDF5 prior to the 3.0 release.
>> Here's an example based on what I was doing.
>> I looked over the docs and it does mention that there is an option to
>> throw away the 'fil
On 05.06.2013 09:15, Seref Arikan wrote:
> You would be suprised to see how convenient HDF5 can be in small scale
> data :) There are cases where one may need to use binary serialization
> of a few thousand items, but still needing metadata, indexing and other
> nice features provided by HDF5/pyTab
On 05.06.2013 03:29, Tim Burgess wrote:
> I was playing around with in-memory HDF5 prior to the 3.0 release.
> Here's an example based on what I was doing.
> I looked over the docs and it does mention that there is an option to
> throw away the 'file' rather than write it to disk.
> Not sure how to
You would be suprised to see how convenient HDF5 can be in small scale data
:) There are cases where one may need to use binary serialization of a few
thousand items, but still needing metadata, indexing and other nice
features provided by HDF5/pyTables.
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 2:29 AM, Tim Burg
Hi Tim,
Il 05/06/2013 03:29, Tim Burgess ha scritto:
> I was playing around with in-memory HDF5 prior to the 3.0 release. Here's an
> example based on what I was doing.
> I looked over the docs and it does mention that there is an option to throw
> away
> the 'file' rather than write it to disk.
Hi list,
Il 05/06/2013 00:38, Anthony Scopatz ha scritto:
> On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 12:30 PM, Seref Arikan wrote:
>
>> I think I've seen this in the release notes of 3.0. This is actually
>> something that I'm looking into as well. So any experience/feedback about
>> creating files in memory would
12 matches
Mail list logo