[issue24323] Typo in Mutable Sequence Types documentation.

2015-05-31 Thread Raymond Hettinger
Changes by Raymond Hettinger : -- resolution: -> not a bug status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing

[issue24323] Typo in Mutable Sequence Types documentation.

2015-05-31 Thread Eric V. Smith
Eric V. Smith added the comment: I don't feel particularly strongly about it. It's mildly more confusing in the 3.x docs than 2.7 because it's the only use in that section of an optional argument. I disagree that s.pop(i) is wrong, since it agrees with the "Results" column. But I agree it's n

[issue24323] Typo in Mutable Sequence Types documentation.

2015-05-31 Thread Raymond Hettinger
Raymond Hettinger added the comment: There isn't much defense against an overly literal reading of the docs. Both ``s.pop([i])`` and ``s.pop(i=-1)`` fail (the latter because pop doesn't take key word arguments and the docstring calls it "index". Also, you would have to define *s* and *i*.

[issue24323] Typo in Mutable Sequence Types documentation.

2015-05-31 Thread Raymond Hettinger
Changes by Raymond Hettinger : -- assignee: docs@python -> rhettinger nosy: +rhettinger ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list ma

[issue24323] Typo in Mutable Sequence Types documentation.

2015-05-29 Thread Eric V. Smith
Eric V. Smith added the comment: s.pop(i=-1) doesn't actually work, but I guess it gets the point across. For 2.7 it's even more confusing, since it includes: s.index(x[, i[, j]]) and s.sort([cmp[, key[, reverse]]]) I'd suggest not changing the 2.7 docs. -- ___

[issue24323] Typo in Mutable Sequence Types documentation.

2015-05-29 Thread Yury Selivanov
Yury Selivanov added the comment: I think it should be changed to `pop(i=-1)`. -- nosy: +yselivanov ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-

[issue24323] Typo in Mutable Sequence Types documentation.

2015-05-29 Thread Eric V. Smith
Changes by Eric V. Smith : -- versions: -Python 3.2, Python 3.3 ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

[issue24323] Typo in Mutable Sequence Types documentation.

2015-05-29 Thread Eric V. Smith
Eric V. Smith added the comment: It's trying to say that "i" is optional, as stated in the footnote. I agree it would be better written as "s.pop(i)", since square brackets are otherwise used in that section as indexing operators. But the footnote should stay, explaining what happens if you om

[issue24323] Typo in Mutable Sequence Types documentation.

2015-05-29 Thread eimista
New submission from eimista: In section (https://docs.python.org/3.5/library/stdtypes.html#mutable-sequence-types) written "s.pop([i])". But this syntax doesn't work. Maybe the correct notation will be "s.pop(i)"? -- assignee: docs@python components: Documentation messages: 244365 nosy