2006/2/8, Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> On Tue, 7 Feb 2006, Graham Dumpleton wrote:
>
> > I'll also say +1 as core group vote. This means all 4 have voted
> > as +1 and no need to wait 72 hours now to see if I would veto it.
>
> OK, I stuck the file on apache.org/dist for mir
Sébastien Arnaud wrote:
Hi,
I would like to report:
+1 Gentoo 2005.1 (amd64), Apache 2.0.55-prefork, Python 2.4.2
After replacing the troubling line (line 3038, configure):
from:
MP_VERSION=`echo $MP_VERSION | sed s/\\"//g`
to (Deron's 1st suggestion):
MP_VERSION=`echo $MP_VERSION | sed 's/"/
configure fails when using bash 3.1.x
-
Key: MODPYTHON-122
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MODPYTHON-122
Project: mod_python
Type: Bug
Components: core
Versions: 3.1.4, 3.2
Environment: Any platform using bas
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MODPYTHON-122?page=all ]
Jim Gallacher updated MODPYTHON-122:
Description:
A bug in bash 3.1 causes configure to fail. This has been reported on recent
versions of Gentoo and and discussed on the mod_python mai
On Tue, 7 Feb 2006, Graham Dumpleton wrote:
/* [2 1/2] map filename to storage */
ap_hook_map_to_storage(PythonStorageHandler,
NULL, NULL, APR_HOOK_MIDDLE);
The function name doesn't ring a bell, so I probably was not aware of it.
Could this be something m
I think we have enough +1's. (If someone could tally them up in a single
e-mail, that'd be great.) Should we start a core-group vote, or wait some
more? On the bash issue - I think we can leave it as is, the affected
distros will just have to maintain a patch in their build systems.
Grisha
+1 Slackware 10.1, Apache 2.0.55 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.4
Jim Gallacher wrote:
Mod_python 3.2.7 tarball is available for test. Here's hoping this will
be to final time we need your help testing before the official release.
3.2.7 adds a fix for the connection read issue that was causing proble
On 2/7/06, Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Feb 2006, Graham Dumpleton wrote:
>
> > /* [2 1/2] map filename to storage */
> > ap_hook_map_to_storage(PythonStorageHandler,
> >NULL, NULL, APR_HOOK_MIDDLE);
>
> The function name doe
Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy wrote:
I think we have enough +1's. (If someone could tally them up in a single
e-mail, that'd be great.) Should we start a core-group vote, or wait
some more? On the bash issue - I think we can leave it as is, the
affected distros will just have to maintain a patc
OK so my core group vote is +1 for this release.
It has been tested on a wide array of OSes, both threaded and forked
MPMs, Python 2.2, 2.3 and 2.4, so I guess it's okay. A threaded test
on MacOSX and Solaris would have been great but maybe the recommended
MPM on those platform is the forked one,
I assumed we would have a separate thread for the core vote, but what
the heck. :)
+1 is my core vote.
Jim
Nicolas Lehuen wrote:
OK so my core group vote is +1 for this release.
It has been tested on a wide array of OSes, both threaded and forked
MPMs, Python 2.2, 2.3 and 2.4, so I guess it'
On Tue, 7 Feb 2006, Jim Gallacher wrote:
I assumed we would have a separate thread for the core vote, but what the
heck. :)
+1 is my core vote.
+1 from me as well.
Grisha
Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy wrote:
On Tue, 7 Feb 2006, Jim Gallacher wrote:
I assumed we would have a separate thread for the core vote, but what
the heck. :)
+1 is my core vote.
+1 from me as well.
When the core group votes for a release candidate, is it a consensus
vote or a majorit
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MODPYTHON-122?page=comments#action_12365490
]
Graham Dumpleton commented on MODPYTHON-122:
Or as someone else suggested, maybe:
MP_VERSION=`echo $MP_VERSION | sed 's/"//g'`
or:
MP_VERSION=`echo $MP_V
On Feb 7, 2006, at 9:32 AM, Jim Gallacher wrote:
When the core group votes for a release candidate, is it a
consensus vote or a majority vote? To quote from the Apache voting
guidelines, "An action item requiring consensus approval must
receive at least 3 binding +1 votes and no vetos. An a
Nicolas Lehuen wrote ..
> OK so my core group vote is +1 for this release.
>
> It has been tested on a wide array of OSes, both threaded and forked
> MPMs, Python 2.2, 2.3 and 2.4, so I guess it's okay. A threaded test
> on MacOSX and Solaris would have been great but maybe the recommended
> MPM o
On Tue, 7 Feb 2006, Graham Dumpleton wrote:
I'll also say +1 as core group vote. This means all 4 have voted
as +1 and no need to wait 72 hours now to see if I would veto it.
OK, I stuck the file on apache.org/dist for mirrors to pick it up. Next
step is the download page change, then the an
Improvements associated with the req.ap_auth_type attribute.
Key: MODPYTHON-124
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MODPYTHON-124
Project: mod_python
Type: Improvement
Components: core
Version
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MODPYTHON-124?page=comments#action_12365525
]
Graham Dumpleton commented on MODPYTHON-124:
FWIW, where example gave:
# Do all the processing of Authorization header and
# validate user etc. If not
19 matches
Mail list logo
