Sorry, I just thought that:
if '>' in rawdata[j:]
would do a search, that is, that the implementation of "in" would just
reuse/call the implementation of "find" and that the position returned would be
used as:
-1: not in
!= -1: in
which seemed to me like the easy implementation of "in". That's
Thank you David, I didn't think of the issue tracker.
I have just done it.
Guido
- Ursprüngliche Message -
Von: R. David Murray
An: Developer Developer
CC: "python-dev@python.org"
Gesendet: 16:59 Montag, 11.Februar 2013
Betreff: Re: [Python-Dev] Question
-- Ursprüngliche Message -
Von: Fred Drake
An: Developer Developer
CC: "python-dev@python.org"
Gesendet: 15:10 Montag, 11.Februar 2013
Betreff: Re: [Python-Dev] Question regarding: Lib/_markupbase.py
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 7:16 AM, Developer Developer
wrote:
> Wouldn't it
Hello all,
I was having a look at the file: Lib/_markupbase.py (@ 82151), function:
"_parse_doctype_element" and have seen something that has caught my attention:
if '>' in rawdata[j:]:
return rawdata.find(">", j) + 1
Wouldn't it be better to do the following?
pos = rawdata.find(">", j)
if
