Thank you for all core devs!
I'll polish the implementation until 3.6b2.
On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 6:42 AM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> It's in! Congrats, and thanks for your great work! See longer post by Victor.
>
> On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 12:16 AM, INADA Naoki wrote:
>> On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 2:
It's in! Congrats, and thanks for your great work! See longer post by Victor.
On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 12:16 AM, INADA Naoki wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 2:05 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
>> Hopefully some core dev(s) can work on this during the core sprint, which is
>> from Sept 5-9.
>>
>
> O
On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 2:05 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> Hopefully some core dev(s) can work on this during the core sprint, which is
> from Sept 5-9.
>
OK. While I'm in Japan (UTC+9) and cannot join the sprint, I'll be
active as possible
while the sprint.
Thank you!
>
> --
> --Guido van Ros
Hopefully some core dev(s) can work on this during the core sprint, which
is from Sept 5-9.
On Sat, Aug 27, 2016 at 7:59 PM, INADA Naoki wrote:
> Last call. There are only two weeks until 3.6 beta.
> Please review it if possible.
>
> On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 10:12 PM, INADA Naoki
> wrote:
> > Hi
Last call. There are only two weeks until 3.6 beta.
Please review it if possible.
On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 10:12 PM, INADA Naoki wrote:
> Hi, devs.
>
> I've implemented compact and ordered dictionary [1], which PyPy
> implemented in 2015 [2].
>
> Since it is my first large patch, I would like to h
Hi Inada,
On 10 August 2016 at 18:52, INADA Naoki wrote:
> a. dict has one additional word and support ring internally.
> b. OrderedDict reimplements many APIs (iterating, resizing, etc...) to
> support ring.
There is a solution "c." which might be simpler. Let's think first
about what occurs
>>
>> I've implemented compact and ordered dictionary [1], which PyPy
>> implemented in 2015 [2].
>
>
> Does this mean that keyword arguments will become ordered?
>
> Yury
>
Yes, regardless it will be language spec or just an implementation detail
like PyPy
On 2016-08-09 9:12 AM, INADA Naoki wrote:
Hi, devs.
I've implemented compact and ordered dictionary [1], which PyPy
implemented in 2015 [2].
Does this mean that keyword arguments will become ordered?
Yury
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@pyt
On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 6:02 AM, Xavier Combelle
wrote:
>
>
> On 10/08/2016 17:06, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
>> * there are nice speedups
>>
> in this blog post
> https://morepypy.blogspot.fr/2015/01/faster-more-memory-efficient-and-more.html
> it is mentioned big speedup only on microbenchmark an
On 10/08/2016 17:06, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
> * there are nice speedups
>
in this blog post
https://morepypy.blogspot.fr/2015/01/faster-more-memory-efficient-and-more.html
it is mentioned big speedup only on microbenchmark and small speedups on
pypy benchmark. is it what you call nice speedups
Thanks you for supporting.
BTW, my patch doesn't include OrderedDict speedup. (I'll try it when
compact dict is merged.)
In case of Python 3, OrderedDict.move_to_end(key, last=False) can append
item at front.
So implementing OrderedDict based on compact dict is not so easy as
OrderedDict = dict.
Hello everyone.
I did do only a cursory look on that one, but I would like to
reiterate that this gives huge benefits in general and we measured
nice speedups on pypy (where all the dicts are ordered forever):
* you can essentially kill OrderedDict or make it almost OrderedDict =
dict (in pypy it
Hi, devs.
I've implemented compact and ordered dictionary [1], which PyPy
implemented in 2015 [2].
Since it is my first large patch, I would like to have enough time for
review cycle by Python 3.6 beta1.
Could someone review it?
[1] http://bugs.python.org/issue27350
[2]
https://morepypy.blogsp
13 matches
Mail list logo