[EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
Nicolas Fleury wrote:
>
[...]
Actually, I ~would~ like to limit it to just named groups.
I reckon, if you're not going to bother naming a group, then why would
you have any interest in it.
I guess its up for discussion how confusing this "new" way of thinking
could be
At 08:48 AM 4/3/05 +0200, Martin v. Löwis wrote:
I personally think that the proposed functionality should *not* live
in a separate module, but somehow be integrated into SRE.
+1.
Whether or
not the proposed functionality is useful in the first place, I don't
know. I never have nested named group
Asking mostly for curiousity, how hard would it be to have longs store
their sign bit somewhere less aggravating? It seems to me that the
top bit of ob_digit[0] is always 0, for example, and I'm sure this
would result no less convolution in longobject.c it'd be considerably
more localized convolut
Michael Hudson wrote:
Asking mostly for curiousity, how hard would it be to have longs store
their sign bit somewhere less aggravating? It seems to me that the
top bit of ob_digit[0] is always 0, for example, and I'm sure this
would result no less convolution in longobject.c it'd be considerably
m
Greetings,
> If this kind of functionality would fall on immediate rejection for
> some reason, even writing the PEP might be pointless. If the
[...]
In my opinion the functionality is useful.
> I personally think that the proposed functionality should *not* live
> in a separate module, but some
Greetings Chris,
> Well, that would be something I'd want to discuss here. As I'm not
> sure if I actually ~want~ to match the API of the re module.
If this feature is considered a good addition for the standard
library, integrating it on re would be an interesting option.
But given what you say
Hi Michael,
On Sun, Apr 03, 2005 at 04:14:16PM +0100, Michael Hudson wrote:
> Asking mostly for curiousity, how hard would it be to have longs store
> their sign bit somewhere less aggravating?
As I guess your goal is to get rid of all the "if (size < 0) size = -size" in
object.c and friends, I s
Hi Gustavo!,
On 4/4/2005, "Gustavo Niemeyer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Well, that would be something I'd want to discuss here. As I'm not
>> sure if I actually ~want~ to match the API of the re module.
>
>If this feature is considered a good addition for the standard
>library, integrating it
