On Monday 25 March 2019 22:24:14 DL Neil wrote:
> On 26/03/19 12:55 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > On Monday 25 March 2019 18:20:29 DL Neil wrote:
> >> On 26/03/19 10:38 AM, John Doe wrote:
> >>> What is your favorite Python IDE?
> >>
> >> In case you are tempted to reply, neither of "John"'s suppose
On Monday 25 March 2019 22:14:48 Spencer Graves wrote:
> On 2019-03-25 18:55, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > On Monday 25 March 2019 18:20:29 DL Neil wrote:
> >> On 26/03/19 10:38 AM, John Doe wrote:
> >>> What is your favorite Python IDE?
> >>
> >> In case you are tempted to reply, neither of "John"'s s
As proposed on python-ideas, i setup a repo to turn mail threads into
articles.
here is the repo
https://github.com/Abdur-rahmaanJ/py-mailing-list-summary
i included a script to build .md to .html (with syntax highlighting) here
is the index
https://abdur-rahmaanj.github.io/py-mailing-list-summ
On 25Mar2019 23:24, Dave wrote:
On 3/25/19 10:58 PM, DL Neil wrote:
On 26/03/19 1:10 PM, Dave wrote:
I use Python3 3, and expected learning how to use configparser
would be no big deal. Well! Seems there is configparser,
stdconfigparser, and safeconfigparser, and multiple ways to set
the s
On 3/25/19 10:58 PM, DL Neil wrote:
Dave,
On 26/03/19 1:10 PM, Dave wrote:
I use Python3 3, and expected learning how to use configparser would
be no big deal. Well! Seems there is configparser, stdconfigparser,
and safeconfigparser, and multiple ways to set the section and entries
to the
Dave,
On 26/03/19 1:10 PM, Dave wrote:
I use Python3 3, and expected learning how to use configparser would be
no big deal. Well! Seems there is configparser, stdconfigparser, and
safeconfigparser, and multiple ways to set the section and entries to
the section. A little confusing. I want
On 2019-03-25 18:55, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Monday 25 March 2019 18:20:29 DL Neil wrote:
On 26/03/19 10:38 AM, John Doe wrote:
What is your favorite Python IDE?
In case you are tempted to reply, neither of "John"'s supposed domains
resolves (to a web site)/has been registered.
--
Regards =
On 26/03/19 12:55 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Monday 25 March 2019 18:20:29 DL Neil wrote:
On 26/03/19 10:38 AM, John Doe wrote:
What is your favorite Python IDE?
In case you are tempted to reply, neither of "John"'s supposed domains
resolves (to a web site)/has been registered.
--
Regards =
On 2019-03-25 22:38, Grant Edwards wrote:
On 2019-03-25, Larry Martell wrote:
On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 3:45 PM CrazyVideoGamez wrote:
wait no nevermind im such an idiot
Every programmer I have ever known has said that.
And never saying that is a 100% reliable indicator that you really are
Congrats to all for a timely release! -- H
On Mon, 25 Mar 2019 at 17:19, Ned Deily wrote:
> https://blog.python.org/2019/03/python-373-is-now-available.html
>
> Python 3.7.3 is now available. Python 3.7.3 is the next
> maintenance release of Python 3.7, the latest feature release of Python.
> Yo
I use Python3 3, and expected learning how to use configparser would be
no big deal. Well! Seems there is configparser, stdconfigparser, and
safeconfigparser, and multiple ways to set the section and entries to
the section. A little confusing. I want to future-proof may code, so
what should
John Doe writes:
> What is your favorite Python IDE?
The same as my favourite JavaScript IDE, Haskell IDE, and any other
language I need:
Emacs and a shell multiplexer (today, that's GNU Screen, but others
swear that I should try TMux).
An IDE, like all of the tools that we rely on for getting
On Monday 25 March 2019 18:20:29 DL Neil wrote:
> On 26/03/19 10:38 AM, John Doe wrote:
> > What is your favorite Python IDE?
>
> In case you are tempted to reply, neither of "John"'s supposed domains
> resolves (to a web site)/has been registered.
>
> --
> Regards =dn
your email agent is inventin
https://blog.python.org/2019/03/python-373-is-now-available.html
Python 3.7.3 is now available. Python 3.7.3 is the next
maintenance release of Python 3.7, the latest feature release of Python.
You can find Python 3.7.3 here:
https://www.python.org/downloads/release/python-373/
See the What’s
On 2019-03-25, Larry Martell wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 3:45 PM CrazyVideoGamez
> wrote:
>> wait no nevermind im such an idiot
>
> Every programmer I have ever known has said that.
And never saying that is a 100% reliable indicator that you really are
one...
--
Grant Edwards
On 26/03/19 10:38 AM, John Doe wrote:
What is your favorite Python IDE?
In case you are tempted to reply, neither of "John"'s supposed domains
resolves (to a web site)/has been registered.
--
Regards =dn
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Been using IDEs for 30 years (turbopascal anyone?): by far, PyCharm (used
for 5 years so far). Then VS Code (one year). I still use both. Vs Code is
faster to load, uses less mem and has a simplicity about it that is
appealing.
BUT vscode has similar speed to pycharm once started (actually might e
What is your favorite Python IDE?
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 3:45 PM CrazyVideoGamez wrote:
> wait no nevermind im such an idiot
Every programmer I have ever known has said that.
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 3/25/19 2:30 PM, CrazyVideoGamez wrote:
I have no idea what "TypeError: unsupported operand type(s) for +: 'function' and
'int'" means
It means that you're trying to add an int to a function.
> ... and I don't know how to fix it. Help!
Don't do that?
It's possible that with the correct c
On Wednesday, March 20, 2019, at 7:34:53 PM UTC-4, CrazyVideoGamez wrote:
> So, I typed in code:
> from turtle import *
> forward(100)
> right(120)
> clear()
> It didn't work! It kept on saying that there was an indent and the first line
> was wrong. Help!
wait no nevermind im such an idiot
--
h
On Wednesday, March 20, 2019 at 8:29:42 PM UTC-4, MRAB wrote:
> On 2019-03-21 00:12, DL Neil wrote:
> > Jason,
> >
> > On 21/03/19 12:34 PM, jasonanyil...@gmail.com wrote:
> >> So, I typed in code:
> >> from turtle import *
> >> forward(100)
> >> right(120)
> >> clear()
> >> It didn't work! It kep
On 3/25/19 12:30 PM, CrazyVideoGamez wrote:
I have no idea what "TypeError: unsupported operand type(s) for +: 'function' and
'int'" means and I don't know how to fix it. Help!
It means you can't add (i.e. apply the + operator) a function to an int.
Which is only a problem because somewhere
On Monday, March 25, 2019 at 2:07:11 PM UTC-4, Bassam Abdul-Baki wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> In the following code, there's a bug on certain parameters.
>
> --
>
> def per(n, steps = 0):
> digits = [int(i) for i in str(n)]
> result = 1
> for j in digits:
> result *= j
> steps += 1
> p
On Monday, March 25, 2019, at 3:31:09 PM UTC-4, CrazyVideoGamez wrote:
> I have no idea what "TypeError: unsupported operand type(s) for +: 'function'
> and 'int'" means and I don't know how to fix it. Help!
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
I have no idea what "TypeError: unsupported operand type(s) for +: 'function'
and 'int'" means and I don't know how to fix it. Help!
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 3/25/2019 8:14 AM, Bassam Abdul-Baki wrote:
Greetings,
In the following code, there's a bug on certain parameters.
--
def per(n, steps = 0):
digits = [int(i) for i in str(n)]
result = 1
for j in digits:
result *= j
steps += 1
print(steps, result, sep=" - ")
if result
Bassam,
Greetings.
On 26/03/19 1:14 AM, Bassam Abdul-Baki wrote:
Greetings,
In the following code, there's a bug on certain parameters.
--
def per(n, steps = 0):
digits = [int(i) for i in str(n)]
result = 1
for j in digits:
result *= j
steps += 1
print(steps, result, sep
Bassam Abdul-Baki wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> In the following code, there's a bug on certain parameters.
>
> --
>
> def per(n, steps = 0):
> digits = [int(i) for i in str(n)]
> result = 1
> for j in digits:
> result *= j
> steps += 1
> print(steps, result, sep=" - ")
> if result ==
On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 5:08 AM Bassam Abdul-Baki wrote:
>
> def per(n, steps = 0):
> if len(str(result)) == 1:
> print(" --- DONE ---")
> return "DONE"
> else:
> per(result, steps)
>
> --
>
> What the program does:
> If I run per(X) and X is a multiple of 10, I should end up with
Greetings,
In the following code, there's a bug on certain parameters.
--
def per(n, steps = 0):
digits = [int(i) for i in str(n)]
result = 1
for j in digits:
result *= j
steps += 1
print(steps, result, sep=" - ")
if result == 0:
print(result, str(result), len(str(result)), sep
31 matches
Mail list logo
