[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I seem to be able to register and upload from web site but not command
> line. Command line register attempts keep giving " Server response
> (401): Authorization Required"
>
> Any ideas?
You probably need to set up a .pypirc file in your home directory. Info
here:
ht
gregarican wrote:
> gavino wrote:
> > wtf
>
> You have to be trolling I would think.
Yeah, gavino has been trolling comp.lang.lisp for quite some time. For
the life of me I can't understand why he would troll comp.lang.python
when comp.lang.lisp is there.
-Adam
--
http://mail.python.org/mailma
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Recently I've had some problems with PythonWin when I switched to
> Py2.5, tooka long hiatus, and came back. So now I'm without my god sent
> helper, and I'm looking for a cool replacement, or some advocation to
> reinstall/setup PyWin. But the Python website's list is i
exhuma.twn wrote:
> On Oct 19, 3:44 pm, "exhuma.twn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Oct 18, 10:41 pm, "Adam Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > > exhuma.twn wrote:
> > > > Hi all,
> >
> >
exhuma.twn wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> yesterday I wanted to install TurboGears, which depends on
> RuleDispatch. However, I failed to download it. First I got the error
> "Bad Gateway" from the server, today it's simply a "Not Found" error.
> So what happened to it? Does somebody know?
>
> I would reall
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I dont mean only google, also other sites aswell
Google expressly forbids doing any form of automated search outside of
their api. If you want to write a script that will run Google searches,
you have to use the api to do so. As far as I know most of the other
search si
Gregory Piñero wrote:
> Say hello to pydelicious's new home ;-)
> http://code.google.com/p/pydelicious/
>
> -Greg
Unless you are the original project's maintainer or have their consent
on this it is usually bad form to name your fork the same thing as the
original project. Granted, for something
Brian L. Troutwine wrote:
> The heading comment to pprint reads:
>
> # This is a simple little module I wrote to make life easier. I
> didn't
> # see anything quite like it in the library, though I may have
> overlooked
> # something. I wrote this when I was trying to read some heavily
> nest
John Henry wrote:
> Hi folks.
>
> I am interested on this topic as well.
>
> If my application is not database related, what would be a good choice?
>
> I have clients that wish to use my Python applications but I am not
> willing to give them the code. So, I am thinking about setting it up
> as
James Stroud wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> I am interested in setting up a modest invoicing system for some
> consulting I am doing. I like the idea of managing this on the web and
> creating invoices and printing them from a browser. However, I'm not
> really sure where to start. I've played with some
Francach wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to use the Beautiful Soup package to parse through the
> "bookmarks.html" file which Firefox exports all your bookmarks into.
> I've been struggling with the documentation trying to figure out how to
> extract all the urls. Has anybody got a couple of longer ex
John Salerno wrote:
> Adam Jones wrote:
>
> > I think SA's extra flexability
> > is worth the effort.
>
> Thanks for the reply. Do you mean in the above quote that SA is a little
> more complicated than SO?
Yes, it is. To avoid the technical issues involved the c
John Salerno wrote:
> Are there any major differences between these two? It seems they can
> both be used with TurboGears, and SQLAlchemy with Django. I'm just
> wondering what everyone's preference is, and why, and if there are even
> more choices for ORM.
>
> Thanks.
Currently most of my work i
Jaroslaw Zabiello wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > + SqlObject allows working with the DB tables without
> > using SQL itself.
>
> Rails has ActiveRecord ORM, which IMO has nicer and simpler
> syntax than SQLObject. Rails has migrations, TB - not (Migrations is
> versioning system for evolv
Bruno Desthuilliers wrote:
> Paul Boddie wrote:
> > Ray wrote:
> (snip)
> >> We're a Java shop so
> >> our developers are trained in Java, Struts, Tomcat, etc. Any switch to
> >> a dynamic language will be a huge change. However it baffles me that
> >> they are open to at least a PoC in Rails. but
In my understanding, which relies completely on the judgements of
co-workers regarding the rails side of the debate, TurboGears is more
flexible. Tasks which fall inside the scope of Rails' "opinion" are
probably easier there, but anything outside of what Rails was built to
do is harder than equiva
Gallagher, Tim (NE) wrote:
> I was wondering if there was a way to add a user in active directory to
> a folder and set the permissions.
It should be possible. If you can use VBScript or JScript it will be
easier to find resources for those. You will probably need, at the
least, the win32 extensi
MrBlueSky wrote:
> Thanks for the advice, Adam!
>
> Turbogears sounds like it does everything I want and looks like a
> great... except you've made me nervous with your comment on the
> instability of the Oracle API!
It is not impossible to find a stable ORM for access to Oracle, just
slightly mo
MrBlueSky wrote:
> Hello! I've just finished working on my first Python app (a
> Tkinter-based program that displays the content of our application log
> files in graphical format). It was a great experience that's had a
> very positive response from my colleagues.
>
> So I'd like to try somethi
Just as a note, TurboGears has added a lot that would change the
scoring on this. The project has been moving pretty quickly towards 1.0
lately, and I would advise anyone interested in a comparison to check
out the recent changes before making a final decision. The same will
probably hold true for
Without any more information I would say the biggest contributor to
this dissimilarity is your experience. Having spent an additional five
years writing code you probably are better now at programming than you
were then. I am fairly confident that if you were to take another crack
at these same pro
Ken Tilton wrote:
> Alexander Schmolck wrote:
> > [trimmed groups]
> >
> > Ken Tilton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >
> >>yes, but do not feel bad, everyone gets confused by the /analogy/ to
> >>spreadsheets into thinking Cells /is/ a spreadsheet. In fact, for a brief
> >>period I swore off th
Rony Steelandt wrote:
>
> "One problem is that python tools suck," he wrote. Wallace compared the
> various IDEs and other developer tools available to Microsoft's freely
> available Visual Studio Express and called them "toys."
>
>
>
> What s wrong with VI ??? :)
User error, evidently. Someti
23 matches
Mail list logo
