On Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 11:10:29AM +0200, Fabian Ebner wrote:
> Linux SCSI can throw spurious -EAGAIN in some corner cases in its
> completion path, which will end up being the result in the completed
> io_uring request.
>
> Resubmitting such requests should allow block jobs to complete, even
> if
29.07.2021 16:47, Max Reitz wrote:
On 29.07.21 13:35, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
29.07.2021 13:38, Max Reitz wrote:
On 29.07.21 12:02, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
28.07.2021 10:00, Max Reitz wrote:
On 27.07.21 18:47, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
Hi all!
That's an alt
On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 08:33:40PM +0200, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> I'm interested in following the activity around the NVMe bdrv.
>
> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
> ---
> MAINTAINERS | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
Thanks, applied to my block tree:
https://gitlab.com/ste
From: Stefano Garzarella
I've been working with io_uring for a while so I'd like to help
with reviews.
Signed-off-by: Stefano Garzarella
Message-Id: <20210728131515.131045-1-sgarz...@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi
---
MAINTAINERS | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a
The following changes since commit 3521ade3510eb5cefb2e27a101667f25dad89935:
Merge remote-tracking branch
'remotes/thuth-gitlab/tags/pull-request-2021-07-29' into staging (2021-07-29
13:17:20 +0100)
are available in the Git repository at:
https://gitlab.com/stefanha/qemu.git tags/block-pul
From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
I'm interested in following the activity around the NVMe bdrv.
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
Message-id: 20210728183340.2018313-1-phi...@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi
---
MAINTAINERS | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/MAINTAINE
From: Fabian Ebner
Linux SCSI can throw spurious -EAGAIN in some corner cases in its
completion path, which will end up being the result in the completed
io_uring request.
Resubmitting such requests should allow block jobs to complete, even
if such spurious errors are encountered.
Co-authored-b
On 29.07.21 13:35, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
29.07.2021 13:38, Max Reitz wrote:
On 29.07.21 12:02, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
28.07.2021 10:00, Max Reitz wrote:
On 27.07.21 18:47, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
Hi all!
That's an alternative to (part of) Max's
"[PATCH
Linux SCSI can throw spurious -EAGAIN in some corner cases in its
completion path, which will end up being the result in the completed
io_uring request.
Resubmitting such requests should allow block jobs to complete, even
if such spurious errors are encountered.
Co-authored-by: Stefan Hajnoczi
R
29.07.2021 13:38, Max Reitz wrote:
On 29.07.21 12:02, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
28.07.2021 10:00, Max Reitz wrote:
On 27.07.21 18:47, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
Hi all!
That's an alternative to (part of) Max's
"[PATCH for-6.1? v2 0/7] mirror: Handle errors after READY cance
On 29.07.21 12:02, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
28.07.2021 10:00, Max Reitz wrote:
On 27.07.21 18:47, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
Hi all!
That's an alternative to (part of) Max's
"[PATCH for-6.1? v2 0/7] mirror: Handle errors after READY cancel"
and shows' my idea of handling so
28.07.2021 10:00, Max Reitz wrote:
On 27.07.21 18:47, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
Hi all!
That's an alternative to (part of) Max's
"[PATCH for-6.1? v2 0/7] mirror: Handle errors after READY cancel"
and shows' my idea of handling soft-cancelling READY mirror case
directly in qmp_block_jo
On Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 11:10:29AM +0200, Fabian Ebner wrote:
Linux SCSI can throw spurious -EAGAIN in some corner cases in its
completion path, which will end up being the result in the completed
io_uring request.
Resubmitting such requests should allow block jobs to complete, even
if such spur
13 matches
Mail list logo