On Mon, 16 Oct 2023, 18:04 Peter Maydell, wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Oct 2023 at 15:58, Manos Pitsidianakis
> wrote:
> >
> > Hello Peter,
> >
> > On Mon, 16 Oct 2023, 17:13 Peter Maydell,
> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Fri, 13 Oct 2023 at 13:42, Markus Armbruster
> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Emmanouil Pitsidianakis
On Mon, 16 Oct 2023 at 15:58, Manos Pitsidianakis
wrote:
>
> Hello Peter,
>
> On Mon, 16 Oct 2023, 17:13 Peter Maydell, wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, 13 Oct 2023 at 13:42, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> >
>> > Emmanouil Pitsidianakis writes:
>> >
>> > > Hello,
>> > >
>> > > This RFC is inspired by the kern
Hello Peter,
On Mon, 16 Oct 2023, 17:13 Peter Maydell, wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Oct 2023 at 13:42, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> >
> > Emmanouil Pitsidianakis writes:
> >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > This RFC is inspired by the kernel's move to -Wimplicit-fallthrough=3
> > > back in 2019.[0]
> > > We take
On Fri, 13 Oct 2023 at 13:42, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>
> Emmanouil Pitsidianakis writes:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > This RFC is inspired by the kernel's move to -Wimplicit-fallthrough=3
> > back in 2019.[0]
> > We take one step (or two) further by increasing it to 5 which rejects
> > fall through com
On Fri, Oct 13, 2023 at 03:51:22PM +0300, Manos Pitsidianakis wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Oct 2023 11:14, "Daniel P. Berrangé" wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 13, 2023 at 10:47:04AM +0300, Emmanouil Pitsidianakis wrote:
> > >
> > > Main questions this RFC poses
> > > =
> > >
> > > - I
On Fri, 13 Oct 2023 11:14, "Daniel P. Berrangé" wrote:
On Fri, Oct 13, 2023 at 10:47:04AM +0300, Emmanouil Pitsidianakis wrote:
Main questions this RFC poses
=
- Is this change desirable and net-positive.
Yes, IMHO it is worth standardizing on use of the attribut
On Fri, 13 Oct 2023, Emmanouil Pitsidianakis wrote:
Hello,
This RFC is inspired by the kernel's move to -Wimplicit-fallthrough=3
back in 2019.[0]
We take one step (or two) further by increasing it to 5 which rejects
fall through comments and requires an attribute statement.
[0]:
https://git.ker
On Fri, Oct 13, 2023 at 10:47:04AM +0300, Emmanouil Pitsidianakis wrote:
>
> Main questions this RFC poses
> =
>
> - Is this change desirable and net-positive.
Yes, IMHO it is worth standardizing on use of the attribute. The allowed
use of comments was a nice thing by