On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 10:40:15AM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote:
>On Fri, 19 Feb 2016 15:18:11 +
>Wei Yang wrote:
>
>> Even PCI_CAP_FLAGS has the same value as PCI_MSIX_FLAGS, the later one is
>> the more proper on retrieving MSIX entries.
>>
>> This patch uses PCI_MSIX_FLAGS to retrieve the MS
On Fri, 19 Feb 2016 15:18:11 +
Wei Yang wrote:
> Even PCI_CAP_FLAGS has the same value as PCI_MSIX_FLAGS, the later one is
> the more proper on retrieving MSIX entries.
>
> This patch uses PCI_MSIX_FLAGS to retrieve the MSIX entries.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wei Yang
> CC: Cornelia Huck
> CC: C
On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 02:17:11PM +0800, Yi Min Zhao wrote:
>于 Mon, 22 Feb 2016 14:15:07 +0100
>Christian Borntraeger 写道:
>
>> On 02/19/2016 04:18 PM, Wei Yang wrote:
>> > Even PCI_CAP_FLAGS has the same value as PCI_MSIX_FLAGS, the later one is
>> > the more proper on retrieving MSIX entries.
>>
于 Mon, 22 Feb 2016 14:15:07 +0100
Christian Borntraeger 写道:
> On 02/19/2016 04:18 PM, Wei Yang wrote:
> > Even PCI_CAP_FLAGS has the same value as PCI_MSIX_FLAGS, the later one is
> > the more proper on retrieving MSIX entries.
> >
> > This patch uses PCI_MSIX_FLAGS to retrieve the MSIX entries.
On 02/19/2016 04:18 PM, Wei Yang wrote:
> Even PCI_CAP_FLAGS has the same value as PCI_MSIX_FLAGS, the later one is
> the more proper on retrieving MSIX entries.
>
> This patch uses PCI_MSIX_FLAGS to retrieve the MSIX entries.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wei Yang
> CC: Cornelia Huck
> CC: Christian Born
Even PCI_CAP_FLAGS has the same value as PCI_MSIX_FLAGS, the later one is
the more proper on retrieving MSIX entries.
This patch uses PCI_MSIX_FLAGS to retrieve the MSIX entries.
Signed-off-by: Wei Yang
CC: Cornelia Huck
CC: Christian Borntraeger
---
hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.c |2 +-
1 file