Daniel P. Berrangé writes:
> On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 07:49:54AM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> Eric Blake writes:
>>
>> > On 08/11/2017 11:05 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> >> We've wanted -object to support non-scalar properties for a while.
>> >>
Daniel P. Berrangé writes:
> On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 01:24:17PM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> "Daniel P. Berrange" writes:
>>
>> > On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 12:47:44PM -0500, Eric Blake wrote:
>> >> On 08/11/2017 11:05 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 01:24:17PM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> "Daniel P. Berrange" writes:
>
> > On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 12:47:44PM -0500, Eric Blake wrote:
> >> On 08/11/2017 11:05 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> >> > We've wanted -object to support non-scalar
On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 07:49:54AM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Eric Blake writes:
>
> > On 08/11/2017 11:05 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> >> We've wanted -object to support non-scalar properties for a while.
> >> Dan Berrange tried in "[PATCH v4 00/10]Provide a
"Daniel P. Berrange" writes:
> On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 12:47:44PM -0500, Eric Blake wrote:
>> On 08/11/2017 11:05 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> > We've wanted -object to support non-scalar properties for a while.
>> > Dan Berrange tried in "[PATCH v4 00/10]Provide a
On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 12:47:44PM -0500, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 08/11/2017 11:05 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> > We've wanted -object to support non-scalar properties for a while.
> > Dan Berrange tried in "[PATCH v4 00/10]Provide a QOM-based
> > authorization API". Review led to the conclusion
Eric Blake writes:
> On 08/11/2017 11:05 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> We've wanted -object to support non-scalar properties for a while.
>> Dan Berrange tried in "[PATCH v4 00/10]Provide a QOM-based
>> authorization API". Review led to the conclusion that we need to
>>
On 08/11/2017 11:05 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> We've wanted -object to support non-scalar properties for a while.
> Dan Berrange tried in "[PATCH v4 00/10]Provide a QOM-based
> authorization API". Review led to the conclusion that we need to
> replace rather than add to QemuOpts. Initial