Am 01.03.2018 um 10:57 hat Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy geschrieben:
> 01.03.2018 12:48, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> > Am 01.03.2018 um 08:25 hat Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy geschrieben:
> > > 26.02.2018 17:05, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> > > > Essentially, assuming a simple backing chain 'base <- overlay', we go
01.03.2018 12:48, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Am 01.03.2018 um 08:25 hat Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy geschrieben:
26.02.2018 17:05, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Essentially, assuming a simple backing chain 'base <- overlay', we got
these combinations to represent in NBD (with my suggestion of the flags
to use):
1
Am 01.03.2018 um 08:25 hat Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy geschrieben:
> 26.02.2018 17:05, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> > Essentially, assuming a simple backing chain 'base <- overlay', we got
> > these combinations to represent in NBD (with my suggestion of the flags
> > to use):
> >
> > 1. Cluster allocate
26.02.2018 17:05, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Am 24.02.2018 um 00:38 hat Eric Blake geschrieben:
On 02/23/2018 11:05 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Am 23.02.2018 um 17:43 hat Eric Blake geschrieben:
OFFSET_VALID | DATA might be excusable because I can see that it's
convenient that a protocol driver refers to its
Am 24.02.2018 um 00:38 hat Eric Blake geschrieben:
> On 02/23/2018 11:05 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> > Am 23.02.2018 um 17:43 hat Eric Blake geschrieben:
> > > > OFFSET_VALID | DATA might be excusable because I can see that it's
> > > > convenient that a protocol driver refers to itself as *file instea
On 02/23/2018 11:05 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Am 23.02.2018 um 17:43 hat Eric Blake geschrieben:
OFFSET_VALID | DATA might be excusable because I can see that it's
convenient that a protocol driver refers to itself as *file instead of
returning NULL there and then the offset is valid (though it woul
Am 23.02.2018 um 17:43 hat Eric Blake geschrieben:
> > OFFSET_VALID | DATA might be excusable because I can see that it's
> > convenient that a protocol driver refers to itself as *file instead of
> > returning NULL there and then the offset is valid (though it would be
> > pointless to actually fo
On 02/14/2018 06:05 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
+static int coroutine_fn null_co_block_status(BlockDriverState *bs,
if (s->read_zeroes) {
-return BDRV_BLOCK_OFFSET_VALID | start | BDRV_BLOCK_ZERO;
-} else {
-return BDRV_BLOCK_OFFSET_VALID | start;
+ret |= BDRV_BLOC
Am 14.02.2018 um 15:44 hat Eric Blake geschrieben:
> On 02/14/2018 06:05 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> > Am 13.02.2018 um 21:26 hat Eric Blake geschrieben:
> > > We are gradually moving away from sector-based interfaces, towards
> > > byte-based. Update the null driver accordingly.
> > >
> > > Signed-o
On 02/14/2018 06:05 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Am 13.02.2018 um 21:26 hat Eric Blake geschrieben:
We are gradually moving away from sector-based interfaces, towards
byte-based. Update the null driver accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Eric Blake
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
Reviewed-by: Fam
Am 13.02.2018 um 21:26 hat Eric Blake geschrieben:
> We are gradually moving away from sector-based interfaces, towards
> byte-based. Update the null driver accordingly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Blake
> Reviewed-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
> Reviewed-by: Fam Zheng
>
> ---
> v6-v7: no chan
11 matches
Mail list logo