> On 09 May 2015, at 22:33 , Henrik Bengtsson wrote:
>
> On Sat, May 9, 2015 at 12:55 AM, peter dalgaard wrote:
>>
>>
>> Rephrasing would seem to be in order
>
> Ah... definitely a "parse error" (I read it as a new paragraph). I
> second rephrasing this; your ""Indexing matrices may not
Ah, the woes of English word order -- even this native English speaker
frequently gets messed up!
(but maybe I'm just a bear of little brain).
Best,
Bert
Bert Gunter
Genentech Nonclinical Biostatistics
(650) 467-7374
"Data is not information. Information is not knowledge. And knowledge
is certa
On Sat, May 9, 2015 at 12:55 AM, peter dalgaard wrote:
>
>> On 09 May 2015, at 02:53 , Henrik Bengtsson
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I spotted what looks like another(*) mistake in 'R Language
>> Definition' on how subsetting should work. In Section 'Indexing
>> matrices and arrays'
>> [http://cra
> On 09 May 2015, at 02:53 , Henrik Bengtsson wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I spotted what looks like another(*) mistake in 'R Language
> Definition' on how subsetting should work. In Section 'Indexing
> matrices and arrays'
> [http://cran.r-project.org/doc/manuals/r-release/R-lang.html#Indexing-matrices
Hi,
I spotted what looks like another(*) mistake in 'R Language
Definition' on how subsetting should work. In Section 'Indexing
matrices and arrays'
[http://cran.r-project.org/doc/manuals/r-release/R-lang.html#Indexing-matrices-and-arrays]
one can read
"Negative indices are not allowed in ind
