On Mon, 16 Nov 2009, Richard Cotton wrote:
One tiny thing that would be very nice to have is a default value of n=1 in
the random number generator functions, enabling, e.g., runif() instead of
runif(1). This won't break anyone's existing code and ought to be
relatively straightforward to do.
Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 11/16/2009 11:00 AM, Richard Cotton wrote:
One tiny thing that would be very nice to have is a default value of
n=1 in
the random number generator functions, enabling, e.g., runif() instead of
runif(1). This won't break anyone's existing code and ought to be
relatively
> -Original Message-
> From: r-devel-boun...@r-project.org
> [mailto:r-devel-boun...@r-project.org] On Behalf Of Duncan Murdoch
> Sent: Monday, November 16, 2009 8:28 AM
> To: Richard Cotton
> Cc: r-devel@r-project.org
> Subject: Re: [Rd] n=1 default for random numb
On 11/16/2009 11:00 AM, Richard Cotton wrote:
One tiny thing that would be very nice to have is a default value of n=1 in
the random number generator functions, enabling, e.g., runif() instead of
runif(1). This won't break anyone's existing code and ought to be
relatively straightforward to do.
One tiny thing that would be very nice to have is a default value of n=1 in
the random number generator functions, enabling, e.g., runif() instead of
runif(1). This won't break anyone's existing code and ought to be
relatively straightforward to do.
Is there anyone in the core team who would b
