Dear Roger,
This is incredibly helpful and much appreciated! I re-ran the model using the
method = "BFGS" argument and I can confirm that it worked.
Best regards,
Denys
On Thursday, February 16, 2023 at 03:49:45 AM EST, Roger Bivand
wrote:
On Wed, 15 Feb 2023, Denys Dukhovnov wrote:
On Wed, 15 Feb 2023, Denys Dukhovnov wrote:
Dear Roger,
Yes, I am running R version 4.2.2 and Windows 10 OS x64, packages used
updated to the latest version on CRAN. The panel data I am using is
complete for all the variables and spatial weights, which made me wonder
why the "within" specif
Dear Roger,
Yes, I am running R version 4.2.2 and Windows 10 OS x64, packages used updated
to the latest version on CRAN. The panel data I am using is complete for all
the variables and spatial weights, which made me wonder why the "within"
specification runs perfectly fine, while the "random"
On Wed, 15 Feb 2023, Denys Dukhovnov via R-sig-Geo wrote:
Dear community,
I am trying to run a spatial panel random effects SEM model using splm
package on a balanced spatial panel of N = 2472 and T = 4, and weights
are based on k = 6 nearest neighbors. I encounter this error, which I
can't
Dear community,
I am trying to run a spatial panel random effects SEM model using splm package
on a balanced spatial panel of N = 2472 and T = 4, and weights are based on k =
6 nearest neighbors. I encounter this error, which I can't find anything about
in the documentation or online.
spml(for