[RBW] Re: VO 50.4 BCD Crankset is here

2010-08-21 Thread thirty-six
On 21 Aug, 13:13, Garth wrote: >  In regards to longer cranks, there's a lot of unfounded fear and mis- > information that gets spread .  Longer cranks don't hurt your knees, Yes they do, 170mm cranks give me trouble after about 120miles on a single ride or after about 70miles on a subsequent d

[RBW] Re: VO 50.4 BCD Crankset is here

2010-08-20 Thread thirty-six
On 20 Aug, 04:21, andrew hill wrote: > I don't really understand about crank length and it's benefits. For distance cycling efficiency and freedom from pain it's best to err towards the shorter cranks. Long cranks will over extend the natural range of knee motion and may cause long term injury.

[RBW] Re: Is this rim wear unusual

2010-08-15 Thread thirty-six
On 14 Aug, 03:53, "carnerda...@bellsouth.net" wrote: > My 650B Sam Hillborne has Velocity Synergy rims and Shimano Deore V- > brakes with the pads that came on them. Since new the front wheel has > had a little tick with each revolution while braking.  I assumed this > was a slightly raised join

[RBW] Re: Seat Sgueaks!

2010-07-27 Thread thirty-six
On 27 July, 21:40, Peter Andrews wrote: > The B17 I got just over a year ago is the first Brooks saddle I've > ever had.  I encountered the tedious 'squeak' (creak) for many months, // // >  I chose the tenacious > oil over a heavier grease so it could penetrate better.  Chain oil > would penet

[RBW] Re: Seat Sgueaks!

2010-07-26 Thread thirty-six
On 26 July, 16:18, JimD wrote: > Not mine, the Riv's. > > I'm using a Brooks Swift and it is making noise. I'll characterize it   > as a leathery squeak. > I've lubricated and checked the fasteners and think this is a leather   > squeak not a rail to seat post or seat post to frame squeak. > > H

[RBW] Re: What's a good way to dispose of cf bike forks? (was ... carbon fork to the dump)

2010-03-09 Thread thirty-six
Just think, in ten years, you'll have enough legs for a dining room suite. On 8 Mar, 16:40, Eric Norris wrote: > Here's my solution: > > http://www.flickr.com/photos/35176...@n03/sets/72157623579596200/ > > --Eric > campyonly...@me.comwww.campyonly.comwww.wheelsnorth.org > > On Mar 7, 2010, at 7:

[RBW] Re: Bar height and hand pain... don't know what else to do...

2010-02-26 Thread thirty-six
My problems mostly occurred with padded tape. Using plastic or cotton tape gave me a better hand fit and the occurance of hand pain is now much lessened. Using thin tape allows me to grip the bars without using my palms, on the tops. I prefer this grip in absence of any pain anyway. On 26 Feb,

[RBW] Re: stem length?

2010-02-25 Thread thirty-six
You should generally have the reach in your drops so that it is level with tyre contact. This is affected by the height of fitment, steerer angle and fork rake as well as reach of the bars and stem extension. If your intended bike is not going to be radically different to what you are currently us

[RBW] Re: Raising the bars with mixed results, or: In praise of drop bars

2010-02-25 Thread thirty-six
On 24 Feb, 03:04, Earl Grey wrote: > I set up my Sam with higher drop bars than any bike I have owned since > 1991 (i.e., bars appreciably higher than saddle) :), and Sunday, > before a 150km O24O (O as in over), I raised them some more, maxing > out the cable housing as I had cut it. Note to fu