Re: [RDA-L] 336, 337, 338 and the post-MARC environment

Are the 336,337,338's meant to be displayed? Probably not. Maybe, meant to be used as accessible codes for a FRBRised catalog search yet to be developed? Carolyn Kadri Special Collections Cataloger University of Texas at Arlington From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and

Re: [RDA-L] Contributors' list

I think you could use "Project director" from the MARC CodeLlist for Relators. The definition is as follows "Use for a person or organization with primary responsibility for all essential aspects of a project, or that manages a very large project that demands senior level responsibility, or tha

Re: [RDA-L] First Page is Unnumbered (pagination is part of a larger sequence)

I use your number 2 option. It seems the more logical way in the spirit of RDA. I don't think we should ignore unnumbered pages in a resource. At this point, a standardized way of indicating this situation (unnumbered pages in a resource) is evolving and should become part of a "best practices"

Re: [RDA-L] Relationships and comic books/graphic novels

serv.lac-bac.gc.ca] On Behalf Of Patrick Crowley Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2013 10:33 AM To: RDA-L@listserv.lac-bac.gc.ca<mailto:RDA-L@listserv.lac-bac.gc.ca> Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Relationships and comic books/graphic novels Perhaps you could construe the colorist as an illuminator? ;) On Thu, A

Re: [RDA-L] Tag 9 in Bib Record

I have looked this OCLC record over and over and I don't see a tag field 9 or 466 in it. Is it possible you are referencing the wrong OCLC record? Carolyn Kadri Special Collections Cataloger University of Texas at Arlington Arlington, TX 76019 817-272-7153 From: Resource Description and Access

Re: [RDA-L] Relationships and comic books/graphic novels

I find that the MARC relator terms and codes lists much more robust and explanatory than those listed in the RDA appendices at this point in time. Even though I check the RDA appendices, I usually wind up using terms/codes form the MARC relators lists. And of course, the RDA appendices don't ha

Re: [RDA-L] Corrected DVD sample

f Of Kadri, Carolyn J Sent: Monday, March 18, 2013 11:29 AM To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Corrected DVD sample The link you provided to sample RDA records isn't working for me. When I click it on I get the report "page not found". Any ideas? Carolyn -O

Re: [RDA-L] Corrected DVD sample

The link you provided to sample RDA records isn't working for me. When I click it on I get the report "page not found". Any ideas? Carolyn -Original Message- From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access [mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of J. McR

Re: [RDA-L] Relator code and term punctucation

I have been putting a comma after the name and a period after the relator code and no period after $4. Example: Smith, James, $e publisher. $4 pbl Don't know that any one way is better than the other, but in the absence of any instructions anywhere, I defaulted to this pattern because it seem

Re: [RDA-L] GMD revisited

Has anyone using Voyager decided to do this? That is, add back 245/ $h gmd in the local system? I agree that the 336, 337, 338 don’t need to be viewable which ours are not. Thanks. Carolyn Kadri Special Collections Cataloger University of Texas at Arlington Arlington, TX 76019 817-272-7153 Fr

Re: [RDA-L] Relator terms vs. codes

according to their preferences? Thanks. Carolyn -Original Message- From: J. McRee Elrod [mailto:m...@slc.bc.ca] Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2012 12:42 PM To: Kadri, Carolyn J Cc: RDA-L@listserv.lac-bac.gc.ca Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Relator terms vs. codes Carolyn Kadri asked: >I am j

Re: [RDA-L] Relator terms vs. codes

I am just wondering if anyone else is putting both relator text, subfield e, and subfield 4, relator codes, in their OCLC originals? In the absence of any information about use one or the other, I have been inputting both in my original contributions to OCLC. In most cases, using the MARC21 rela

Re: [RDA-L] Order of 040 subfields

I stand corrected. Actually, I don't speak " MARC21 schema for linked data and Semantic Web applications", so, I spoke out of ignorance of the full potential impact for metadata applications. I appreciate the informative link Gordon sent out. I have been trying to develop a basic understanding o

Re: [RDA-L] Order of 040 subfields

I have been following this thread about the 040. Does it really matter what order the subfields are placed in in the 040 in an online environment? Does it affect any retrieval reports? Are we being a "little anal-retentive" in devoting so much discussion to this issue just for the sake of "cons

Re: [RDA-L] Order of 040 subfields

For the 040, I have been trying to follow the order given in a new RDA workform; that is, $b eng followed by $e rda Don't know if it makes any difference or not what the order is. Carolyn Kadri Head Cataloger Special Collections University of Texas at Arlington Arlington, TX 76016 ka...@uta.edu

Re: [RDA-L] RDA and subject access

I have been providing subject access points in my RDA MARC 21 records just as I always did with AACR2 cataloging, from LCSH. It was my understanding that subject access according to RDA is not developed as of this date for use for in RDA records. Robert seemed to be indicating that using the sa

Re: [RDA-L] AACR2 records in OCLC

Nor have I seen anything to the contrary and I have been keeping my eyes open looking for an update from OCLC on this policy. Therefore, we are not upgrading any I level OCLC existing record to RDA as instructed by OCLC in their policy statement release in 2011. Carolyn Kadri Head Cataloger Spe

Re: [RDA-L] 260 vs 264 fields

Also, even though OCLC has given permission to use the 264 now, the advice I am getting from OCLC is that it might be better to postpone using it until more clarification is available to those of us out in the trenches about how it is to be applied. I am not sure where that clarification of app

Re: [RDA-L] Comparison table of extent terms

Thanks Adam, I have been creating original cataloging for 19th century atlases in RDA and using two 336's one for cartographic image and one for text to my RDA record to account for those volumes that are atlases but have a significant amount of text as do many of the 19th century atlases that

Re: [RDA-L] RDA Update Forum at ALA Annual

According to the e mail below "The text of RDA is now available". Does this mean that RDA is released? And available for viewing through the toolkit? Carolyn Kadri Cataloger Special Collections University of Texas at Arlington Arlington, TX 76019 From: Resource Description and Access / Resource D

Re: [RDA-L] RDA and reproductions

How do you know that no one is using the 534 for reproductions right now? I use it quite frequently when cataloging reproductions of pre-twentieth cartographic materials. Carolyn -Original Message- From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access [mailto:[EMAIL P

Re: [RDA-L] RDA database now with MARC index

Are some MARC tags being eliminated in RDA? I tried the MARC index mentioned below just to experiment with it. I put in 534 in the box, and the only reproduction MARC field that came up was 533. Appendix D of RDA only references 533 also. Just curious. Thanks. Carolyn Kadri Chair, Map and Geog