: Re: [RDA-L] 2 manifestations on one bibliographic record
Rich McRae asked:
>When there is a digitized copy made of a hard-copy item- both separate
>mani= festations according to FRBR, is it mandated by RDA rules that
>two bibliogr= aphic records should be created? ...
That is my unde
Rich McRae asked:
>When there is a digitized copy made of a hard-copy item- both separate mani=
>festations according to FRBR, is it mandated by RDA rules that two bibliogr=
>aphic records should be created? ...
That is my understanding, just as it was mandated by AACR2. So far,
so far as I know
AC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] 2 manifestations on one bibliographic record
Rick McRae wrote:
> When there is a digitized copy made of a hard-copy item- both separate
> manifestations according to FRBR, is it mandated by RDA rules that two
> bibliographic records should be created? Or is this an
Rick McRae wrote:
> When there is a digitized copy made of a hard-copy item- both separate
> manifestations according to FRBR, is it mandated by RDA rules that two
> bibliographic records should be created? Or is this an option, and that,
> with the proper coding (00x, 33x, etc.) and description,
Greetings-
When there is a digitized copy made of a hard-copy item- both separate
manifestations according to FRBR, is it mandated by RDA rules that two
bibliographic records should be created? Or is this an option, and that, with
the proper coding (00x, 33x, etc.) and description, hybrid recor
5 matches
Mail list logo