LOL, good Friday humor, Liz.
On Fri, 9 Aug 2013, Elizabeth O'Keefe wrote:
Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2013 18:01:39 -0400
From: Elizabeth O'Keefe
Reply-To: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Discussion
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Discussion lacuna
That is why I like to do RDA workshops in October. All those entities and
manifestations, and the occasional medium.
On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 5:01 PM, Elizabeth O'Keefe wrote:
Or to the manifestations. As illustrated in th
That is why I like to do RDA workshops in October. All those entities and
manifestations, and the occasional medium.
On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 5:01 PM, Elizabeth O'Keefe wrote:
> Or to the manifestations. As illustrated in this 19th-century engraving:
>
>
> http://macabremuseum.com/collections-dat
Or to the manifestations. As illustrated in this 19th-century engraving:
http://macabremuseum.com/collections-database/spirits-and-their-manifestations-an-evening-seance-engraving/
Liz O'Keefe
On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 5:38 PM, Gene Fieg wrote:
> I agree. And that is why we don't follow pcc rul
I agree. And that is why we don't follow pcc rules altogether. For
instance, we will add the "Translation of" note, include pagination of
bibliographies if appropriate. We do think that entries should be
justified in the description. Why? Because we have to realize that
cataloging uses very tr
It bothers me in our discussions concerning RDA usage, that most parse
the rules without reference to patron service.
No set of rules can every cover all eventualities. In the absence of
a rule, e.g., how to record "'61" as a date of production, the most
important consideration it seems to me sho
6 matches
Mail list logo
