Fox, Chris wrote:
> I'm fine with going with just the date, if there's agreement that it isn't
> published
>
I was going to comment on this point up-thread, but was waylaid till now.
Is the choreographer creating DVDs of the performance for whomever asks for
it? If so, this sounds like a print-
One of the lines has Montclaire; should be Montclair. I used to go there a
lot in my youth. Bloomfield and Montclair were huge football rivals.
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 1:04 PM, J. McRee Elrod wrote:
> Chris Fox posted:
>
> >ferocious beauty:
> >GENOME
> >Liz Lerman
> >Dance Exchange
> >
> >LIZ
Chris Fox posted:
>ferocious beauty:
>GENOME
>Liz Lerman
>Dance Exchange
>
>LIZ LERMAN
>DANCE EXCHANGE
>FEROCIOUS BEAUTY:
>GENOME
>MONTCLAIR STATE U.
>April 13, 2008
>LLDX
>Genome:
>Montclair
>Chaptered
>4/12/08
>
>Again, my confusion still remains on what date to use.
The copy you have was pr
bility vs Producer's Name, etc.)
>
> Deborah
>
> - - - - - - - -
> Deborah Fritz
> TMQ, Inc.
> debo...@marcofquality.com
> www.marcofquality.com
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access
> [
Original Message-
From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access
[mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of Deborah Fritz
Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2013 9:28 AM
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] recording production statements
Disclaimer: I am not
Deborah Fritz made some sensible points, but ...
>So, rather than trying to discover that (who made the DVD), perhaps we
>should just invoke the CORE instruction and just give the date (which is the
>only core Production Statement element) that we think the copy was made
>(perhaps [2013?])
The da
-Original Message-
From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access
[mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of J. McRee Elrod
Sent: Friday, March 29, 2013 9:14 PM
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] recording production statements
Deborah cited
Or, to be safe, you could say [between 2008 and 2013]
On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 8:30 PM, J. McRee Elrod wrote:
> Chris Fox asked:
>
> >Do I infer date of production based on the performance date (2008),
> >or when I think the disc was actually created (2013)?
>
> If you decide on 2013, don't forg
Deborah cited RDA:
>I did see that 2.7.4.2 contradicts 2.7.4.7, but I interpreted it the other
>way around: that 2.7.4.7 should be adjusted, because we were not allowed to
>supply a publisher, etc. name under AACR; so I felt that RDA was continuing
>that policy. However, I see that we *are* allowe
Chris Fox asked:
>Do I infer date of production based on the performance date (2008),
>or when I think the disc was actually created (2013)?
If you decide on 2013, don't forget 518 for performance date.
Might it be that the video recording was made of the 2008 performance,
and a copy made for
] On Behalf Of Deborah Fritz
Sent: Friday, March 29, 2013 4:10 PM
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] recording production statements
I did see that 2.7.4.2 contradicts 2.7.4.7, but I interpreted it the other way
around: that 2.7.4.7 should be adjusted, because we were not allowed
2013 5:36 PM
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] recording production statements
On the producer's name, 2.7.4.2, sources of information, include the same
sources as the others:
Take producers' names from the following sources (in order of preference):
a) the same source
Snow, 1842.
-Original Message-
From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access
[mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of Deborah Fritz
Sent: Friday, March 29, 2013 3:16 PM
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] recording production statements
Chri
A] On Behalf Of J. McRee Elrod
Sent: Friday, March 29, 2013 4:55 PM
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] recording production statements
Chris Fox asked:
>If true, where and how in the MARC record do I record the production
>statem= ent?
Use 264 0 $a$b$c, with
Chris Fox asked:
>If true, where and how in the MARC record do I record the production statem=
>ent?
Use 264 0 $a$b$c, with the place, name of the dance company, and year,
each in its own two brackets.
Providing producer of unpublished material (264 0)is one of RDA's
very few good innovatio
Please excuse cross-posting...
Hello,
I am trying to catalog a DVD which I *think* would be considered unpublished:
A professor here wrote to the choreographer of a performance he saw to find out
if it was possible to obtain a recording of the dance. He was told by the
choreographer that she
16 matches
Mail list logo
