Dana Van Meter posted:
>Thanks Mac. Do we really need a 501 note and 700$a$t for the Introduzione,
>and the bibliography?
We would only consider it if written by a very well known person, and it is
lengthy. Rather than $t, you could use $ewriter of added text.
>I kind of found the answer to
settled on this list, I
couldn't find that it was when querying the Archives.
Thanks very much for your help,
Dana
-Original Message-
From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access
[mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of J. McRee Elrod
Sent: Thursday,
Michael Borries posted:
>501 is for use for separate bibliographical works bound together,
>either by the publisher or the library.
We prefer to use exact notes rather than lump everything in 500. This
both frees us from determining note order and speeds finding a
specific note. We use 501 for
Dana Van Meter posted:
>I have a facsimile reprint, which is not at first glance a
>facsimile reprint, but it is. My book has a new title page, followed by
>28 unnumbered pages which contain an added Introduction ...
I would certainly adjust the collation to include the added pages,
record the i
4 matches
Mail list logo