Re: [RDA-L] Facsimile reprint

2013-11-25 Thread J. McRee Elrod
Dana Van Meter posted: >Thanks Mac. Do we really need a 501 note and 700$a$t for the Introduzione, >and the bibliography? We would only consider it if written by a very well known person, and it is lengthy. Rather than $t, you could use $ewriter of added text. >I kind of found the answer to

Re: [RDA-L] Facsimile reprint

2013-11-25 Thread Dana Van Meter
settled on this list, I couldn't find that it was when querying the Archives. Thanks very much for your help, Dana -Original Message- From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access [mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of J. McRee Elrod Sent: Thursday,

Re: [RDA-L] Facsimile reprint

2013-11-22 Thread J. McRee Elrod
Michael Borries posted: >501 is for use for separate bibliographical works bound together, >either by the publisher or the library. We prefer to use exact notes rather than lump everything in 500. This both frees us from determining note order and speeds finding a specific note. We use 501 for

Re: [RDA-L] Facsimile reprint

2013-11-21 Thread J. McRee Elrod
Dana Van Meter posted: >I have a facsimile reprint, which is not at first glance a >facsimile reprint, but it is. My book has a new title page, followed by >28 unnumbered pages which contain an added Introduction ... I would certainly adjust the collation to include the added pages, record the i