> On April 17, 2015, 6:22 p.m., Bill Farner wrote:
> > Can you include a test case proving that AURORA-1268 is fixed?
>
> Brian Wickman wrote:
> Shouldn't that be in the reapplication of 27a602d2?
It would be nice to tease apart the bug fix and the new feature. I'm fine if
the bug fix com
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/33317/#review80500
---
Ship it!
Master (b18dc44) is green with this patch.
./build-suppo
> On April 17, 2015, 6:22 p.m., Bill Farner wrote:
> > Can you include a test case proving that AURORA-1268 is fixed?
Shouldn't that be in the reapplication of 27a602d2?
- Brian
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, v
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/33317/#review80496
---
Can you include a test case proving that AURORA-1268 is fixed?
- Bi
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/33317/
---
Review request for Aurora, Brian Brazil and Joshua Cohen.
Bugs: AURORA-1268
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/32597/#review80480
---
src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/async/preemptor/PendingTa
