[RhinoMocks] Re: System.TypeLoadException when using MockRepository

2009-01-19 Thread Colin Desmond
We're using 3.5 SP1. When I rewrite the interface as C# it is happy. I'll try playing with the C++/CLI syntax a little and see if I can get it to work. Colin On Jan 18, 9:15 pm, Ayende Rahien wrote: > what version of the runtime?if you write the same thing in C#, does it cause > any issues? >

[RhinoMocks] Set only properties

2009-01-19 Thread Colin Desmond
In the fluent syntax is it possible to test whether a set only property (not get method defined) is called. I am not too bothered about the parameters being passed. So far I have tried: m_contactPresenter.ContactAdapter.AssertWasCalled(a => a.Names); and Expect.Call (m_contactPresenter.Contact

[RhinoMocks] Re: System.TypeLoadException when using MockRepository

2009-01-19 Thread Colin Desmond
.Int32! Colin On Jan 19, 9:32 am, Colin Desmond wrote: > We're using 3.5 SP1. > > When I rewrite the interface as C# it is happy. I'll try playing with > the C++/CLI syntax a little and see if I can get it to work. > > Colin > > On Jan 18, 9:15 pm, Ayende Rahien

[RhinoMocks] Re: System.TypeLoadException when using MockRepository

2009-01-19 Thread Colin Desmond
OK, I am happy with that as a solution. Colin. On Jan 19, 12:45 pm, Ayende Rahien wrote: > The issue is a problem with modopt in the CLR.Since it is the same thing > from your perspective, please use int > > On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 5:24 AM, Colin Desmond < > > colin.de

[RhinoMocks] Re: Set only properties

2009-01-19 Thread Colin Desmond
Excellent, thank you Phil. Colin On Jan 19, 3:52 pm, Phil wrote: > try: m_contactPresenter.ContactAdapter.AssertWasCalled(a => a.Names = > null); > > On Jan 19, 3:03 am, Colin Desmond > wrote: > > > In the fluent syntax is it possible to test whether a set only &

[RhinoMocks] Multiple expectations on the same method

2009-01-21 Thread Colin Desmond
I want to check that a particular method is called 3 times on a single mocked instance, is there a way of expressing this in Rhino Mocks 3.5? In particular, if it is only called twice, I want the test to fail. Many thanks Colin --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received t

[RhinoMocks] Re: Multiple expectations on the same method

2009-01-21 Thread Colin Desmond
Excellent, thanks this worked just fine. Colin. On Jan 21, 2:28 pm, Tim Barcz wrote: > var mockObj = MockRepository.GenerateMock(); > > ... > > mockObj.AssertWasCalled(x=>x.SomeMethod(), o=>o.Repeat.Times(3)); > > On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 8:21 AM, Col

[RhinoMocks] Re: Multiple expectations on the same method

2009-01-21 Thread Colin Desmond
ould also write using Lain's example: > > mockObj.Expect(x=>x.SomeMethod()).Repeat.Time(3)) > > (just depends on how you prefer things). > > On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 8:52 AM, Colin Desmond < > > colin.desm...@btopenworld.com> wrote: > > > Excellent, thanks t

[RhinoMocks] Ordered expectations

2009-01-21 Thread Colin Desmond
Sorry for battering the list with a host of questions in a short period of time, but I am new to Rhino Mocks (like yesterday) and absolutely loving it! Unfortunately, the only documentation I have found (http://ayende.com/Wiki/Rhino+Mocks+3.5.ashx) does not answer all my questions! I want to be a