On 27 Nov 2001, Dave Madole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The bug has something to do with verbosity - it works fine without verbosity
> on. The irony, of course, is that one turns verbosity on to fix these things
> (I have applied the hang patch, BTW). The last thing I see is the
> "match_rep
The bug has something to do with verbosity - it works fine without verbosity
on. The irony, of course, is that one turns verbosity on to fix these things
(I have applied the hang patch, BTW). The last thing I see is the
"match_report" message, then the program hangs in select.
Here are the sym
rsync -avu --include 'tmp1/*/*.c' --include "*/" --exclude "*" tmp1 tmp2
The above command copies all the empty directories under tmp1/ . Is there any way to
avoid it?
On 27 Nov 2001, Dave Dykstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Unfortunately there is no way to search the archive. That would be very
> useful.
Just use google and say
site:lists.samba.org rsync mbp prototype
or whatever.
--
Martin
On 27 Nov 2001, Dave Dykstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2.4.7 isn't released yet. Martin has put a lot of changes in the last week
> into CVS, and when I tried it yesterday it didn't compile anywhere but
> Linux. Today it looks a bit better but I still have problems on all my
> platforms exce
On Tue, Nov 27, 2001 at 01:22:43PM -0800, Simison, Matthew wrote:
> turns out, I have an rsync virtual site builder script, which makes the
new
> user
> conf file run with perm 400. And apparently someone thought that the main
> rsyncd.conf file needed to be the same, and that killed all connecti
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 15:34:15 -0600
From: Dave Dykstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[ . . . ]
No, the difficulty of turning on the optimization is irrelevant because the
optimization is no longer in the current version of rsync. It is only
needed to do the performance test whic
Unfortunately there is no way to search the archive. That would be very
useful.
I haven't heard of any similar problems reported with hard links before,
and I've been following this list closely for several years. I notice
your command line looks pretty complicated, so I suggest that you try
On Tue, Nov 27, 2001 at 02:34:22PM -0500, Lenny Foner wrote:
...
> I know you're trying to get reliable statistics so it's clear what
> sort of performance we're talking about here. But may I respectfully
> suggest that -having- to be so careful about whether optimization
> actually got turned on
I have had rsync set up for 3 years running fine.
suddenly I am getting an error.
@ERROR: Unknown module 'root'
I haven't changed the versions, nor any of the configs, nor the OS.
The module is clearly in there and worked yesterday.
What could be causing this?
rsync v 2.3.1
Solaris 7
[root]
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 10:49:11 -0600
From: Dave Dykstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Thank you very much for doing the test Alberto. I didn't have any set of
files that large on which I could do a test, and as I said when I tested
the worse case I could think of with my application I
I am sorry if this has been covered before: I have done a couple of
futile searches in the bug reporting system and is there any way to
search the archive?
I am having a strange symptom: I am synching directories (that have
very long file names, by the time the full path is specified) and a lot
I can reproduce it, and I think you've stumbled on a significant bug. The
problem is that rsync always assumes stat variable "st_rdev", which
contains both the major and minor number, is always 4 bytes and is always
the same format on both sides. On the rsync I tried on Linux, it is 8
bytes, whe
Hi All,
I'm running rsync version 2.4.6 protocol version 24 on several Solaris 2.8
computers, and seversl RedHat Linux 7.2 computers. I have several
character devices that I am rsyncing from my Solaris computer. Rsync
works from one solaris to another solaris computer. But rsyncing these
devic
Thank you very much for doing the test Alberto. I didn't have any set of
files that large on which I could do a test, and as I said when I tested
the worse case I could think of with my application I couldn't measure an
appreciable difference.
First, I want to make sure that you really did get t
Actually, my patch already has that in rsync_module():
if (is_a_socket(f_in)) {
addr = client_addr(f_in);
host = client_name(f_in);
} else {
char *ssh_client = getenv("SSH_CLIENT");
addr = ssh_client ? ssh_client : "n
Hi --
Sorry for the delay getting back to you; Thanksgiving holiday
intervened and I'm only now catching up on my email backlog
1. You're entirely right about the --remote-user option. I'll remove that.
2. I'll merge with the latest version from CVS.
3. I'll do that; I prefer -u myself.
>
Dear all,
here's my own (renewed) pitch to throw in a --files-from patch.
As Dave has suggested in the past, transferring a list of files can be
accomplished using --include and --exclude, and has called for people
to test the performance gains of his old optimization when using these
options (s
Ugh,
Thanks everyone. What a Monday I came back to after the long weekend.
If I had my head screwed on straight... I already knew all this but forgot
in the heat of non related issues.
Again! Thanks!
Matt Anderson
On Monday 26 November 2001 2:53 pm, you wrote:
> Hello everyone.
> I can't se
On Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 02:53:30PM -0800, Matt Anderson wrote:
> Hello everyone.
> I can't seem to get the --password-file= option to work correctly. I'm using
> ssh as the transport. I've got the file 0600 and only the password with no
> carriage return.
> Can someone provide an example of us
20 matches
Mail list logo
