Hi,
I'm a happy camper @ rsync (and rsnapshot) since years. Thanks for this major
piece of software.
In an attempt to reorganize my rsnapshot backups, I stumbled across an issue,
that I'm trying to seeking a more sophisticated solution here.
Given, I have a deeply branched tree, where I would
I believe you can shorten that to:
+ /some/very/
+ /some/very/deep/
+ /some/very/deep/path/
+ /some/very/deep/path/to/
+ /some/very/deep/path/to/save/***
- /some/*
You could also exclude /some and then use /some/very/deep/path/to/save
as an additional source. I don't know if rsnapshot can handle
Am Mittwoch, 7. August 2019, 17:36:01 CEST schrieb Kevin Korb via rsync:
> I believe you can shorten that to:
>
> + /some/very/
> + /some/very/deep/
> + /some/very/deep/path/
> + /some/very/deep/path/to/
> + /some/very/deep/path/to/save/***
> - /some/*
Unfortunately, this doesn't work, since it p
Hello,
I want to avoid transferring a file which is present both on the source
tree and on the target tree when calling rsync with -a --delete.
mkdir -pv src/ dst/
echo file1 > src/file
echo file2 > dst/file
rsync -navi --delete --exclude file src/ dst/
works as expected. The file is not transf
It is a little confusing but in order to have an exclude dir merge
filter do both things (prevent transfer and prevent deletion) then it
needs to be on both ends of the transfer. The file on each end only has
partial effect on what rsync does.
Think of it like a file you (as a regular user) can m