On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 3:09 PM, just subscribed for rsync-qa from
bugzilla via rsync wrote:
> https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13317
>
> --- Comment #6 from Rui DeSousa ---
> (In reply to Rui DeSousa from comment #5)
>
> It looks like no error is returned and result is a sparse file. I
You could try using an automounter, like autofs, in combination with
sshfs. It'll be slower, possibly a lot slower, but it should be more
reliable over an unreliable connection.
I've been using:
remote
-fstype=fuse,allow_other,nodev,noatime,reconnect,ServerAliveInterval=15,ServerAliveCountMax=40
e-
> From: Kevin Korb via rsync [mailto:rsync@lists.samba.org]
> Sent: zondag 25 maart 2018 22:42
> To: rsync@lists.samba.org
> Subject: Re: Rsync between 2 datacenters not working
>
> Note that if you do this you are stuck with --whole-file
>
> On 03/25/2018 04:36 PM, Dan
Is there such a thing?
I saw librsync, which appears to be the right algorithm, but not the
protocol.
And I saw the acrosync-library, which appears to be the protocol, but it's
not GPL-compatible.
Are there others?
Thanks!
--
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing
On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 12:02 PM, Дугин Сергей via rsync <
rsync@lists.samba.org> wrote:
> I am launching a cron bash script that does the following:
>
> Day 1
> /usr/bin/rsync -aH --link-dest /home/backuper/.BACKUP/009/2018-06-25
> root@192.168.1.103:/home/ /home/backuper/.BACKUP/009/2018
Hi.
Is it possible that, if day4 is consuming too much space, that day3 was an
incomplete backup?
The rsync wrapper I wrote goes to a little trouble to make sure that
incomplete backups aren't allowed. It's called Backup.rsync, and can be
found at:
https://stromberg.dnsalias.org/~strombrg/Backup
On Sun, Dec 13, 2020 at 11:59 AM Wayne Davison via rsync <
rsync@lists.samba.org> wrote:
> I should also mention that there are totally valid reasons why the dir
> might be huge on day4. For instance, if someone changed the mode on the
> files from 664 to 644 then the files cannot be hard-linked t
On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 3:25 AM Laurent B via rsync
wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I'm encountering a problem with one of my backup. For some files, the
> checksum calculation is failing leading to the following error :
>
It sounds a little like a bug, but perhaps if you share the command you're
using fo
Hi Harry. Are you the person I worked with at UCI a bit?
Anyway, you might consider trying mrsync; it's intended to do rsync over
multicast.
HTH.
On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 12:22 PM Harry Mangalam via rsync <
rsync@lists.samba.org> wrote:
> Spent an hour trying to find the answer to this on the v
I've not looked into mrsync and multiple interfaces; I'm guessing it'll use
your (multicast) routing table.
On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 1:13 PM Harry Mangalam via rsync <
rsync@lists.samba.org> wrote:
> mrcast is interesting (Hadn't stumbled across it before) but while it
> handles multicat, it doesn
This is probably more of a Cygwin question than an rsync question.
On Cygwin, E: should show up automatically as /cygdrive/e
You can test that by opening a Cygwin terminal and cd'ing to /cygdrive/e
On Tue, Apr 6, 2021 at 1:32 PM Tim Evans via rsync
wrote:
> Cygwin distribution of rsync for Win
In Backup.rsync, which of course is a wrapper around rsync that can be used
for backups, I do not use --backup, but I do use --link-dest:
https://stromberg.dnsalias.org/~strombrg/Backup.remote.html
On Sun, Jul 18, 2021 at 11:13 PM Lisa via rsync
wrote:
> I would like some feedback about the --ba
I suppose I may as well mention:
https://stromberg.dnsalias.org/~dstromberg/Backup.remote
It just does rsync snapshotting with --link-dest, and keeps the last n
snapshots. It's smart enough to resume a previously interrupted snapshot.
It's pretty simple - both to set up and to use. I used to us
I was thinking --link-dest too.
Sometimes this can be done with cpio too; check out the -pdlv options.
On Sat, Sep 4, 2021 at 4:57 PM Kevin Korb via rsync
wrote:
> Rsync does almost everything cp does but since it is designed to network
> it never got that feature. I was thinking maybe --link-
rsync --link-dest is fast and simple, good stuff.
I recommend using it with some sort of wrapper script for rotations, like
Backup.rsync:
https://stromberg.dnsalias.org/~strombrg/Backup.remote.html
On Wed, Oct 6, 2021 at 7:29 AM Kevin Korb via rsync
wrote:
> See --link-dest. That is what makes
Can rsync back up an NTFS using a Windows 10 kernel? So far I've had good
luck backing up NTFS filesystems on a dual boot system when booted into
Linux, but not when booted into Windows.
I've been bitten in the past by /usr/bin/find (for EG) having problems with
Windows junctions over sshfs. The
On Thu, Feb 3, 2022 at 3:50 PM Andy Smith via rsync
wrote:
> I am tempted to blow away the btrfs filesystem and just do xfs to
> xfs, to rule out weird issues there. It would be a shame though as
> I was hoping to use btrfs's compression here.
>
You might be able to do a partial transfer to a sm
Why not rsync directly as root? Then you can use a passwordless,
passphraseless RSA (or similar) keypair.
On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 4:58 AM Dr. Mark Asbach via rsync <
rsync@lists.samba.org> wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> We are using ansible to deploy system configuration and web application
> source cod
On Sat, Mar 12, 2022 at 12:23 PM Dr. Mark Asbach via rsync <
rsync@lists.samba.org> wrote:
> Hi there, hi past me,
>
> > My (non-working) attempt:
> > […]
> > So it seems the "-l" is dropped into the void letting ssh assume USER
> was the target host? I don’t actually get what I can do.
>
> Turns
I suspect you want a duplicate finder more than a file transfer tool.
EG: https://stromberg.dnsalias.org/~strombrg/equivalence-classes.html
On Tue, Jun 7, 2022 at 5:36 PM hput via rsync wrote:
> I want to merge 3 slightly different directories of mostly images.
>
> Not just mostly but the vast
On Wed, Aug 3, 2022 at 5:41 PM Robin Lee Powell via rsync <
rsync@lists.samba.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 03, 2022 at 02:04:22PM -0400, Rob Campbell via rsync wrote:
> > The problem isn't that there are many syncs because the problem happens
> on
> > the first one that runs.
>
> You didn't actually
21 matches
Mail list logo