On Sat, 24 Dec 2011 at 10:27AM -0800, Sony wrote:
> \documentclass{article}
> \usepackage{sagetex}
> \begin{document}
> \begin{sagesilent}
> mathematica('myplot = Plot[Sin[x], {x, 0, 2 Pi}]')
> mathematica('Export["%s/example3.eps", myplot]'%os.getcwd())
> \end{sagesilent}
> \includegraphics{exampl
Hi Nathann,
Thank you for the timely updates! I agree with you about the calls to
random. I can move those out of the timing portion. I suspected that
the passage to the backend was probably responsible for the slow speed
of the add/remove edge/vertices calls. The cost of method calls is
overhead I
Oh yes, and something else about your benchmark : try to avoid using "rand"
methods when you are doing one, especially when you test such low-level
methods, because often the rand() method represents an important part of
the time.
The best would be to compute all the random number you need in a f
Hell !
> Thanks for looking into this. I believe that I stayed within Sage's
> library when I wrote my test code.
You did ! My mistake ! But you actually call
strongly_connected_components_digraph instead of
strongly_connected_components, which mean the function is spending most of
its ti
