On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 02:25:25PM +1100, Nicolas Triantafillou wrote:
> I've been playing around with the Windows 7 Beta to see if it's viable
> for our company and I've been testing it with samba. I've been able to
> browse shares via \\server\sharename without a problem but I'm unable to
> ge
Hi all,
I've been playing around with the Windows 7 Beta to see if it's viable
for our company and I've been testing it with samba. I've been able to
browse shares via \\server\sharename without a problem but I'm unable to
get it to connect to the samba pdc (which currently works fine with XP
On Sunday 18 January 2009 18:38:25 Daniel L. Miller wrote:
> Is it possible to define file rights, such that -
>
> The file is owned by root, with full privleges on the Linux server.
> The file is shared by a group "users".
> The shared file should be available for read and write access.
>
> That p
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 7:38 PM, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
> Is it possible to define file rights, such that -
>
> The file is owned by root, with full privleges on the Linux server.
> The file is shared by a group "users".
> The shared file should be available for read and write access.
>
> That pa
Is it possible to define file rights, such that -
The file is owned by root, with full privleges on the Linux server.
The file is shared by a group "users".
The shared file should be available for read and write access.
That part's easy - but now
Deny delete, overwrite, or rename access to
From:
Kai Blin
To:
Daniel Dekok
Cc:
samba@lists.samba.org
Date:
01/17/2009 12:03 AM
Subject:
Re: [Samba] samba 4 and unix groups
On Friday 16 January 2009 06:01:14 Daniel Dekok wrote:
> I've been using the howto on the wiki, and i've got to the point of
> groups, and it says to use SWAT to li
I've came across what appears to be a bug, but I wanted to get some feedback
on the list before reporting it to make sure I'm not doing something
stupid. I'm using 3.2.7.
I see that when I do "getent passwd", I get an entry like this:
testuser:*:1000:20:Test User:/home/poo/testuser:/bin/bash
But
Hi Jeremy and all,
this is a late reply to a posting from Nov 24:
Jeremy Allison wrote:
Why not use extended attributes to store the read only bit, by
setting :
Thank you for pointing out that I should have switched off all the special
mappings...
store dos attributes = yes
