Re: [Samba] Missing secondary groups

2010-12-02 Thread Peter Trifonov
Hi Timur, > Just a wild guess - could it be the result of moving lockdir in > Samba3.5 port from /var/db/samba34 back to /var/db/samba ? Can you > check, that, by renaming appropriate directory? I have installed Samba 3.4.9, and it started working immediately. So it seems that nss_winbind FreeBS

Re: [Samba] Missing secondary groups

2010-11-30 Thread Peter Trifonov
Hi Timur, > Just a wild guess - could it be the result of moving lockdir in > Samba3.5 port from /var/db/samba34 back to /var/db/samba ? Can you > check, that, by renaming appropriate directory? I have created a symlink /var/db/samba34 pointing to /var/db/samba, but it still does not work. Wi

Re: [Samba] Missing secondary groups

2010-11-30 Thread Timur I. Bakeyev
Hi, Peter! Just a wild guess - could it be the result of moving lockdir in Samba3.5 port from /var/db/samba34 back to /var/db/samba ? Can you check, that, by renaming appropriate directory? Regards, Timur. On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 12:54 PM, Peter Trifonov wrote: > Hi, > >> idmapping does not wo

Re: [Samba] Missing secondary groups

2010-11-30 Thread Peter Trifonov
Hi, > idmapping does not work perfectly for me. idmap_ad backend means it > should use active directory info to determine the unix uid and gid. It may > bypass the issues with local tdb files. In my case Samba is able to allocate UID and GID itself. However, it seems not to be able to communi

Re: [Samba] Missing secondary groups

2010-11-29 Thread Gaiseric Vandal
idmapping does not work perfectly for me. idmap_ad backend means it should use active directory info to determine the unix uid and gid. It may bypass the issues with local tdb files. If you read the man page on wbinfo, you can manually allocate uid's and gid's [--set-uid-mapping uid,sid

Re: [Samba] Missing secondary groups

2010-11-29 Thread Peter Trifonov
Hi, > The problem seems to be with idmapping.In you smb.conf file do you > have a section for "idmap"- this tells samba which unix user id and group id > ranges can be used to correspond to windows users and id's. > the docs on samba.org may be a little out of date so you should also check >

Re: [Samba] Missing secondary groups

2010-11-29 Thread Gaiseric Vandal
The problem seems to be with idmapping.In you smb.conf file do you have a section for "idmap"- this tells samba which unix user id and group id ranges can be used to correspond to windows users and id's. the docs on samba.org may be a little out of date so you should also check the man pa

Re: [Samba] Missing secondary groups

2010-11-29 Thread Peter Trifonov
Hi, > "getent group" to pull the information from winbind. First of all, you need > to make sure that winbind itself is showing users and/or groups from the > Windows server > > "wbinfo -u" > "wbinfo -g" wbinfo does provide the correct information. > Then you need to make sure that

Re: [Samba] Missing secondary groups

2010-11-29 Thread Gaiseric Vandal
My configuration has Samba domain controllers, not Windows domain controllers, so my setup may not be applicable to you. However, in order for unix to use windows groups I believe it needs to use "getent group" to pull the information from winbind. First of all, you need to make sure that w

Re: [Samba] Missing secondary groups

2010-11-28 Thread Peter Trifonov
Hi, > Does "getent group" show the "Windows" groups? No, it does not. > > However, the id command displays only the primary group for domain > > users. > > Furthermore, domain users are not able to access any files owned by their > > non-primary domain groups. > > > > For example, running >

Re: [Samba] Missing secondary groups

2010-11-28 Thread Gaiseric Vandal
Does "getent group" show the "Windows" groups? -Original Message- From: samba-boun...@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-boun...@lists.samba.org] On Behalf Of Peter Trifonov Sent: Saturday, November 27, 2010 11:58 AM To: samba@lists.samba.org Subject: [Samba] Missing secondary groups Hello a