Hi Dinis,
On 29 Mar 2006, at 05:52, Dinis Cruz wrote:
Thanks for confirming this (I wonder how many other other Java
developers are aware of this (especially the ones not focused on
security)).
Most I've worked with aren't really aware of the security manager,
never mind bytecode verific
Hello Eric (comments inline)
Eric Swanson wrote:
> Because I believe that Microsoft will never be as cooperative with .NET and
> the developer community as Sun is with Java, is there an opportunity for
> another company to step up to the plate on Microsoft's behalf?
There is definitely an opportu
Hello Stephen ,
Stephen de Vries wrote:
> I had the same intuition about the verifier, but have just tested this
> and it is not the case. It seems that the -noverify is the default
> setting!
Thanks for confirming this (I wonder how many other other Java
developers are aware of this (especial
On 27 Mar 2006, at 11:02, Jeff Williams wrote:
I am not a Java expert, but I think that the Java Verifier is NOT
used on
Apps that >are executed with the Security Manager disabled (which I
believe
is the default >setting) or are loaded from a local disk (see "...
applets
loaded via the f