Re: [Scottish] GPG Signing

2005-09-06 Thread William Hamilton
ray wrote: >On Tuesday 06 September 2005 07:54, Billy wrote: >Bi> > Hmm, Billy appeared to be using Thunderbird and MS Windows. >Bi> I was/am using Mutt on Linux > >Sorry for my carelessness; I meant William Hamilton, who posted a signed >message. > > > Heh I did wonder there, since I am ca

Re: [Scottish] GPG Signing

2005-09-06 Thread ray
On Tuesday 06 September 2005 07:54, Billy wrote: Bi> > Hmm, Billy appeared to be using Thunderbird and MS Windows. Bi> I was/am using Mutt on Linux Sorry for my carelessness; I meant William Hamilton, who posted a signed message. -- ray ___ Scott

Re: [Scottish] GPG Signing

2005-09-06 Thread ray
On Tuesday 06 September 2005 07:26, William Hamilton wrote: WH> Interesting... This is the next most recent signed SLUG message I could find, but there are a regular sprinkling before then using mutt and kmail :- From: Kyle Gordon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: scottish@mailman.lug.org.uk Subject: Re:

Re: [Scottish] GPG Signing

2005-09-06 Thread ray
On Tuesday 06 September 2005 07:26, William Hamilton wrote: WH> Interesting... This is the next most recent signed SLUG message I could find, but there are a regular sprinkling before then using mutt and kmail :- From: Kyle Gordon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: scottish@mailman.lug.org.uk Subject: Re:

Re: [Scottish] GPG Signing

2005-09-05 Thread Billy
On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 05:23:52AM +0100, ray wrote: > On Tuesday 06 September 2005 00:20, Kyle Gordon wrote: > KG> Godammit. > > Hmm, Billy appeared to be using Thunderbird and MS Windows. I was/am using Mutt on Linux Billy. ___ Scottish mailin

Re: [Scottish] GPG Signing

2005-09-05 Thread William Hamilton
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Interesting... I'm using THunderbird, MS Windows and GPG. I think I have a key set up on my linux desktop, so I'll try sending after work tonight... ray wrote: > On Tuesday 06 September 2005 00:20, Kyle Gordon wrote: > KG> Godammit. > > Hmm, Billy

Re: [Scottish] GPG Signing

2005-09-05 Thread ray
On Tuesday 06 September 2005 05:23, ray wrote: ra> I have just sent two signed messages. This is from KMail 1.8.2 (KDE 3.4.2) signed with "Inline OpenPGP (deprecated)" and This is from KMail 1.8.2 (KDE 3.4.2) signed with "OpenPGP/MIME" both disappeared. mailman.lug.org.uk seems to be discrimi

Re: [Scottish] GPG Signing

2005-09-05 Thread ray
On Tuesday 06 September 2005 00:20, Kyle Gordon wrote: KG> Godammit. Hmm, Billy appeared to be using Thunderbird and MS Windows. This is from KMail 1.8.2 (KDE 3.4.2) NOT signed with "Inline OpenPGP (deprecated)" NOR with "OpenPGP/MIME" I have just sent two signed messages. -- ray ___

Re: [Scottish] GPG Signing

2005-09-05 Thread Kyle Gordon
On Monday 05 Sep 2005 23:33, Billy wrote: > On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 11:22:11PM +0100, William Hamilton wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > Let's find out - this mail is signed :) > > Looks like it just hates Kyle ;-) > > > Billy. > Godammit. My mail server indicate

Re: [Scottish] GPG Signing

2005-09-05 Thread Billy
On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 11:22:11PM +0100, William Hamilton wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Let's find out - this mail is signed :) Looks like it just hates Kyle ;-) Billy. ___ Scottish mailing list Scottish@mailman.lug.o

Re: [Scottish] GPG Signing

2005-09-05 Thread William Hamilton
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Let's find out - this mail is signed :) Kyle Gordon wrote: > Is it just me, or are all mails to the list that are GPG signed getting > silently dropped? > > Kyle -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (MingW32) iD8DBQFDHMUSVcNnxjyrLjoR

Re: [Scottish] GPG Signing

2005-09-05 Thread Sandy Dunlop
I don't know - I use GMail :-( On 9/5/05, Kyle Gordon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Is it just me, or are all mails to the list that are GPG signed getting > silently dropped? > > Kyle > -- > Kyle Gordon > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lodge.glasgownet.com > >