On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 2:11 AM, Martin Langhoff wrote:
> For users that install CentOS and *then* install our stuff, we may
> need to add a warning if we don't see our custom revision prefix. It's
> gotta be a soft warning 'cause we don't really know if it's wrong or
> not.
I'll check that in xs
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 10:48 PM, Daniel Drake wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I now have an XS fully up and running and passing all my basic tests.
> Here are the remaining items that need addressing before we have a
> test release:
>
> ejabberd - see the other thread. Need to decide on forking the package
> as
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 5:48 PM, Daniel Drake wrote:
> I now have an XS fully up and running and passing all my basic tests.
> Here are the remaining items that need addressing before we have a
> test release:
Great news.
> ejabberd - see the other thread. Need to decide on forking the package
>
Hi,
I now have an XS fully up and running and passing all my basic tests.
Here are the remaining items that need addressing before we have a
test release:
ejabberd - see the other thread. Need to decide on forking the package
as 'ejabberd' or 'ejabberd-xs' to move forward. Once that is done, I
wi